Dear expert
could you help to provide some guide upgrade Ceph from firefly to giant ?
many thanks !
2014-10-30 15:37 GMT+07:00 Joao Eduardo Luis :
> On 10/30/2014 05:54 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Nigel Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>>
*
On 10/30/2014 05:54 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Nigel Williams wrote:
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
* *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
related commands now make a distinction between data that is
degraded (there are fewer than t
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Nigel Williams wrote:
> On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > * *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
> >related commands now make a distinction between data that is
> >degraded (there are fewer than the desired number of copies) and
On 30/10/2014 11:51 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
Thus objects are (temporarily) not where they're supposed to be, but still
present in sufficient replication.
thanks for the reminder, I suppose that is obvious :-)
A much more benign scenario than degraded and I hope that this doesn't
even gene
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:40:38 +1100 Nigel Williams wrote:
> On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > * *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
> >related commands now make a distinction between data that is
> >degraded (there are fewer than the desired number
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
* *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
related commands now make a distinction between data that is
degraded (there are fewer than the desired number of copies) and
data that is misplaced (stored in the wrong location
This release will form the basis for the Giant stable series,
v0.87.x. Highlights for Giant include:
* *RADOS Performance*: a range of improvements have been made in the
OSD and client-side librados code that improve the throughput on
flash backends and improve parallelism and scaling on fast
