On 4/20/2012 4:54 AM, Gaffney, Sean P. wrote:
Hi everyone, Thanks for all your feedback.
It's made things clearer for me now. Just to summarise then, a suite of
attributes that would provide a precise numeric description of the data within
a variable could then be (ignoring things such as scal
Thanks, Ros. I had a feeling the CF checker was being precise, I just
couldn't figure out why it wasn't happy. Mystery solved!
Does anyone know if there is any reason why Appendix A limits comments
to non-coordinate variables? That seems ... unusual. I don't recall any
threads discussing this, bu
Hi Nan,
The CF checker is producing the INFO message because according to Appendix
A the "comment" attribute can be attached to either a (G)lobal variable or
a (D)ata variable containing non-coordinate data.
This is just an informational message alerting you to the fact that you may
be using
Hi all -
I've got a question about the correct use of comments in CF.
In chapter 2 of the spec (actually, 2.6.2. Description of file
contents) the term comment is defined this way: "Miscellaneous
information about the data or methods used to produce it."
I'm using comments to describe some of
