RE: MDAC 2.5 - i don't think so

> Note: component checker always seems to come up with a few > "false positives" for mismatched files. Be sure and see the > docs for which ones of these are acceptable and which aren't. The latest Component Checker version has the right info for MDAC 2.5 RTM, which should eliminate the false po

RE: MDAC 2.5 - i don't think so

lly, you don't have a need for MDAC 2.5 so that you don't have to bother with any of this. HTH, Eron -Original Message- From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 6:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MDAC 2.5 - i don't think so On 6/20/00, Ri

Re: MDAC 2.5 - i don't think so

On 6/20/00, Ric Smith penned: >Just so you all know, I installed MDAC 2.5 on >my production server (cf 4.5,nt4 sp6a) and access >didn't like it one bit. I don't know if it's just my >machine or what, but I reinstalled 2.1 and everything >is happy again. The error I got was something like >ODBC Acc

MDAC 2.5 - i don't think so

Just so you all know, I installed MDAC 2.5 on my production server (cf 4.5,nt4 sp6a) and access didn't like it one bit. I don't know if it's just my machine or what, but I reinstalled 2.1 and everything is happy again. The error I got was something like ODBC Access Error (unknown) Just thought I