database. The registry was never meant to be used as a data repository for
frequent read-writes.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
Allaire Certified Instructor
Certified ColdFusion Developer
Fig Leaf Software
1400 16th St NW, # 500
Washington DC 20036
202.797.6570 (direct line)
www.figleaf.com
-Origi
I believe you mean Client variables, and database is preferable, IMHO, for a
number of reasons including, but not limited to:
- the ability to read the info from the db using standard SQL
- do you really want ColdFusion constantly messing with your Registry?
Bob
-Original Message-
From:
> registry or database?
>
> which is better and why?
Database if you're planning on scaling the site. The registry will fill up
pretty quickly.
Russell Conway
HallofSports.com, Inc.
351 West 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011
P (646) 638-2500
F (646) 638-3444
http://www.hallofsports.com
.. . . where
Steven...
Do you mean client variables? Session variables are stored in RAM...
Alec Lamon
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Dworman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 10:46 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: session variable storage
>
>
>
> registry or database?
>
And also it works with clustering.
The downside is that it must tend to be slightly slower.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bob Silverberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: session variable storage
I believe you mean Client
Client Variables in a Database.
1. Registry growth is not good for the machine.
2. Multiple Servers and Load Balancing can be achieved.
Nathan Stanford
President/CEO, C.F. Concepts, Inc.
www.cftipsplus.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Dworman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tu
7 387 8890.
-Original Message-
From: DeVoil, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2001 17:23
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: session variable storage
And also it works with clustering.
The downside is that it must tend to be slightly slower.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bob Silverbe
DELETE FROM CData
WHERE CFID = '#Cookie.CFID#:#Cookie.CFTOKEN#'
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Ewings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: dotcom.lists.cftalk
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: session variable storage
> Yu
database definately, the registry should not be relied on to store session
variables - it will only bloat it in size which will then affect the whole
operating system - in the case where it get's to large it will end up
crashing the system altogether which has happened to me only recently..
> -
Session Vars are only stored in RAM,
AFAIK
Tristram Charnley
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If something is hard to do, its not worth doing!"
Homer Simpson.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Dworman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2001 16:46
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject:
"Tristram
Charnley" To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: session
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 March 2001 10:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: session variable storage
can we use session variables without passing any information through URL
?when browser cookies are disabled on client side.
waitnig for response
ok
Mumtaz
ubble.net> cc:
Subject: RE: session variable stor
ibute, or
retain this message. Please notify us on +44 (0)207 387 8890.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 March 2001 12:39
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: session variable storage
Sir
If we are not using a form ,then what we will do for it.
14 matches
Mail list logo