The Macromedia documentation is inconstant on this
point, and the migration guide as far as I can tell is
wrong.
There is a comment on livedocs re this
> > So, what is meant by the docs saying that "MX
> returns
> > structure keys in the order they are created" as
> opposed to
> > CF5 doing it
I'm sure you're right that that is what it means. But it doesn't behave that way.
The following code returns C, D, B.
#k#
#structKeyList(a)#
A Macromedia rep says it isn't documented to be in any order at all:
http://www.cfbughunt.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=view_bug&BugID=1166&Row=
> So, if I want to have the structure keys (StallionCode in
> this case) come out in my loop in the order I want tthem,
> I'll have to do a new sort as I did in CF5? My ordering the
> query by SortOrder before creating the structure isn't of
> value then, right?
I'm a bit confused by what you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: Structure order in MX
> The reason you see different output when you use your manaul loop
> compared to cfdump is that cfdump gets the keys and then sorts the keys.
>
>
> =
]
WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: E. Keith Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:04 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subje
I am probably misunderstanding the MX docs regarding a structure's order.
"MX returns structure keys in the order they are created. CF5 returned keys
in alpha order."
Am building a structure of Stallions from a query that has ORDER BY
SortOrder.
SortOrder is a number (byte) field in an Access data
6 matches
Mail list logo
