[lld] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

2024-01-24 Thread Alex Voicu via cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[lld] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

2024-01-17 Thread Tony Tye via cfe-commits
@@ -4135,6 +4283,33 @@ Code object V5 metadata is the same as == == = +.. _amdgpu-amdhsa-code-object-metadata-v6: + +Code Object V6 Metadata + +.. warning:: + Code object

[lld] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

2024-01-17 Thread Konstantin Zhuravlyov via cfe-commits
@@ -787,11 +788,15 @@ enum : unsigned { EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX942= 0x04c, EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_RESERVED_0X4D = 0x04d, EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX1201 = 0x04e, + EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX9_GENERIC = 0x04f, kzhuravl wrote: If you coul

[lld] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

2024-01-17 Thread Pierre van Houtryve via cfe-commits
Pierre-vh wrote: @arsenm Hi, can you take a look - especially on the testing? I don't know if this is tested well enough https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi

[lld] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

2024-01-04 Thread Pierre van Houtryve via cfe-commits
Pierre-vh wrote: Note: testing is a bit light for now, I'd like to add more tests, but I'm not sure what kind of tests are worth adding. I could just add a generic target run line wherever gfx9/10/11 run lines are present, but that seems a bit overkill? I'd need to change half the tests we hav