Re: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)

2001-05-09 Thread David McNab
> I hope very much that some judge with > morals and integrity can fix the whole thing some day in the future. Could take a while, especially with Jnr appointing a whole swarm of right-wing judges. - Original Message - From: "Aaron P Ingebrigtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [freenet-chat] getting freenet running on linux

2001-05-09 Thread Tavin Cole
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:34:46PM -0500, Rick Dietz wrote: > I've got the most recent freenet release. I'm running redhat 6.2 and Kaffe. > The process list indicates the server is running. Any ideas about what > might be wrong with the configuration? > rick Well, what port number do you have t

[freenet-chat] getting freenet running on linux

2001-05-09 Thread Rick Dietz
I've got the most recent freenet release. I'm running redhat 6.2 and Kaffe. The process list indicates the server is running. Any ideas about what might be wrong with the configuration? rick [root@www Freenet]# ./freenet_insert freenet:KSK@bush-protest bush_protest.jpg + java Freenet.client

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)

2001-05-09 Thread Mark J. Roberts
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Aaron P Ingebrigtsen wrote: > If he is trying to force people to do things, or not do things, when they > aren't hurting anyone else, or the environment, but I guess I don't > support him. But I sure as HELL don't support Bush!! I could KILL the > SOB if I had the ability an

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)

2001-05-09 Thread Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
On Wed, 2 May 2001 14:42:17 -0400 (EDT) "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2 May 2001, Aaron P Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > > Forceing stupid people to not do stupid things isn't going to > work. > > Forcing people to do what some bigshot thinks is smart isn't going > to > > wo

Re: [freenet-chat] Remuneration for artists via Freenet...etc.

2001-05-09 Thread Mikus 29
>From: "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > My idea of the concept of property is that most people on this planet >find > > it worthwhile to label things as his, hers, theirs, ours, mine, public, > > private, or whatever other forms of ownership you can define. No >government > > is ne