Hello!
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
Since this is the first time I use PackageMaker, I'd be delighted
if someone could verify that the binary works. It's at:
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-2.311.dmg
cheers,
felix
On May 15, 2006, at 2:53 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
ppc? intel? universal?
TIA
Ralph
Raffael Cavallaro, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On 5/15/06, Raffael Cavallaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 15, 2006, at 2:53 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
ppc? intel? universal?
ppc
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
At Mon, 15 May 2006 08:53:14 +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
Since this is the first time I use PackageMaker, I'd be delighted
if someone could verify that the binary works.
Nice! Works for me (OS 10.3.9).
--
Alex
Hello,
On Mon, 15 May 2006 09:21:56 -0500 Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 15 May 2006 08:53:14 +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
Since this is the first time I use PackageMaker, I'd be delighted
if someone could verify that the
Hi Felix,
On 5/15/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
Since this is the first time I use PackageMaker, I'd be delighted
if someone could verify that the binary works. It's at:
Installation of the package went without a hitch on Mac OS X
CMake CMakeLists.txt will now build Chicken from Darcs .scm sources, if
you already have a Chicken compiler installed. It detects any Chicken
installation, tests whether it's a high enough version number, does all
configurations, compiles .scm to .c, and then .c to chicken.exe and
company.
Hello,
On Mon, 15 May 2006 16:33:54 -0700 Matthew Welland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 22:24, felix winkelmann wrote:
The pdf is currently created by a different script. It's a bit of
a pain, since one requires tex for that (or not?).
I think of throwing the pdf out
I'm trying to least expensive way to wrap a C function into
scheme. The following is the C interface to the function I need:
typedef long int integer;
typedef float real;
int gtd6_(integer *iyd, real *sec, real *alt, real *glat, real *glong,
real *stl, real *f107a, real *f107, real *ap, integer
On 5/15/06, Arto Bendiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Felix,
Installation of the package went without a hitch on Mac OS X 10.4.6.
However, upon testing, there seem to be some hardcoded paths somewhere
in there:
$ csc test.scm
sh: line 1: /home/felix/tmp/chicken-package-root/bin/chicken:
On 5/16/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe it can all be built with CMake 2.4.1 beta, available at
http://cmake.org/HTML/Download.html . However, my actual CMake is the
2.5 development version. It contains some LIST commands which I'm not
sure are present or identical
11 matches
Mail list logo