Folks,
Could the option of statical linking be added to the following eggs?:
- fmt
- matpak
- openssl
- sendfile
Thanks in advance and keep up the good work!
Cheers,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.o
> I have updated the egg to allow static linking. If you want to build this
> yourself, consult the .setup script (numbers egg 1.802). It's not quite
> perfect yet, but this should work:
>
> csc myfile.scm -static-extensions -R numbers -X numbers
>
> Do you just want to generate a static executable
Folks,
How can I compile the numbers egg statically? I tried many things but none
seems to work.
Thanks,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
> please try the new version of the openssl egg which I have just uploaded
> to the repository.
>
> I have added code to try clean shutdown but close the network connection
> even if the communications partner does not respond to the shutdown
> notification. This seems like a good compromise to me
> Does adding a "Connection: close" change anything?
Nice idea, but it didn't help.
Cheers,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Thomas,
> the problem is, that closing the in and output ports of an SSL
> connection attempts to do a clean shutdown of the SSL connection. This
> may sometimes take a while because CHICKEN blocks the thread for I/O
> longer than necessary or because the other endpoint of the
> communications cha
Folks,
I just ran into a problem with the openssl egg. If I run the code below
and browse to https://localhost/ it shows the certificate and everything,
but the page keeps loading. Only when I kill the server it actually shows
the page. My guess is that close-input-port and close-output-port don't
> It might be that fltk someone redirects it into the void. I have no clue,
> actually.
I thinks so too, and I might have to dig into the fltk internals. The
funny thing is that it only happens when I use the -R bb option. If I run
it as a batch file using the interpreter everything works fine.
C
eers,
Mark
> Replace "-uses" with "-R".
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
>
> On 6/12/07, Mark Voortman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I finally managed to install fltk and the bb egg. Now I want to compile
>>
Thanks, it works like a charm.
> Replace "-uses" with "-R".
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
>
> On 6/12/07, Mark Voortman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I finally managed to install fltk and the bb egg. Now I want to c
Hello folks,
I finally managed to install fltk and the bb egg. Now I want to compile a
simple program statically, but I can't get it to work. This is the
program:
(bb:init)
(define w (bb:make-widget 'window 200 100))
(bb:group
w
(lambda ()
(let ([lbl (bb:make-widget 'label 200 100)])
(s
Thanks for the info!
> Mark,
>
> On May 10, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Mark Voortman wrote:
>
>> Where did all the space
>> go?
>
> Each scheme object has a header word which stores: 1) Various type
> tags and 2) the length of the object. So, the extra space went int
Hey Zbigniew,
> 1. Which is it, vector or array? If array, which kind (srfi-25,
> array-lib, etc.)
I tried a srfi-25 array with one dimension.
> 2. Have you considered the GC implications?
There should be no garbage collection. I just load it into memory once and
that's it.
> 3. Do you need a
Mark
> Mark Voortman scripsit:
>
>> I have an urgent need to create a vector with a capacity of over 100
>> million elements. However, I get an out of range exception when I call
>> make-array since the numbers of elements is limited to 16777215. Where
>> can
>>
Hi guys,
I have an urgent need to create a vector with a capacity of over 100
million elements. However, I get an out of range exception when I call
make-array since the numbers of elements is limited to 16777215. Where can
I increase this limit?
Thanks!
Mark
_
> On 4/16/07, Mark Voortman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
>> >> move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if
>> it
>> >> is possible to random acce
> On 4/16/07, Mark Voortman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
>> >> move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if
>> it
>> >> is possible to random acce
>> I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
>> move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if it
>> is possible to random access the memory mapped file? For example,
>> read/write only the bytes at position 5 to 10. If I use move-memory! it
>> always s
Hello folks,
I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if it is
possible to random access the memory mapped file? For example, read/write
only the bytes at position 5 to 10. If I use move-memory! it always st
Hello,
Is it possible to compile the syntax-case egg into a statically linked
executable? If yes, how? If no, is there any chance this will be possible
in the near future?
Thanks,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://l
20 matches
Mail list logo
