On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Currently, I don't have any plans for extending the imlib2 egg. However,
> I do think exposing the ugly guts of imlib's context stuff is a good idea.
D'oh! Of course, that should be "I *don't* think exposing the ugly guts..."
Cheers,
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:28:48PM -0400, bill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question - is there any plan to add the imlib-context-set calls to
> the imlib2 egg?
>
> Or in other words, how do you connect the image to a X-window?
Currently, I don't have any plans for extending the imlib2 egg. Howev
Hi,
Quick question - is there any plan to add the imlib-context-set calls to
the imlib2 egg?
Or in other words, how do you connect the image to a X-window?
Bill
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/ma
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:40:06AM -0500, William Ramsay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the Imlib2.egg to save icons with a small drawing program I'm
> writing. If I create an icon that is completely filled with color,
> everything works fine. But if I only draw pixels in part of the icon,
> le
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:40:06AM -0500, William Ramsay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the Imlib2.egg to save icons with a small drawing program I'm
> writing. If I create an icon that is completely filled with color,
> everything works fine. But if I only draw pixels in part of the icon,
> le
Hi,
I'm using the Imlib2.egg to save icons with a small drawing program I'm
writing. If I create an icon that is completely filled with color,
everything works fine. But if I only draw pixels in part of the icon,
leaving the rest transparent, the icon is saved completely messed up.
What
