On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Thomas Van Lenten wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nicolas Sylvain
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Sco
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nicolas Sylvain
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Scott Violet wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Not sure, perhaps Huan could answer that.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nicolas Sylvain
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Scott Violet wrote:
>>>
>>> Not sure, perhaps Huan could answer that. That said, --enable-dcheck
>>> certainly works on the Chromium release bui
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nicolas Sylvain wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Scott Violet wrote:
>
>>
>> Not sure, perhaps Huan could answer that. That said, --enable-dcheck
>> certainly works on the Chromium release builds from the buildbot:
>> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Scott Violet wrote:
>
> Not sure, perhaps Huan could answer that. That said, --enable-dcheck
> certainly works on the Chromium release builds from the buildbot:
> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/continuous/LATEST/ .
Yes, --enable-dcheck is supposed to be disab
Not sure, perhaps Huan could answer that. That said, --enable-dcheck
certainly works on the Chromium release builds from the buildbot:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/continuous/LATEST/ .
-Scott
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Antony Sargent wrote:
> To clarify, doesn't --enable-dcheck onl
To clarify, doesn't --enable-dcheck only work on chromium release builds you
built yourself and not official builds of Google Chrome?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Scott Violet wrote:
>
> One easy suggestion in helping catch bugs is to run Chrome with
> --enable-dcheck . This'll prompt if you
One easy suggestion in helping catch bugs is to run Chrome with
--enable-dcheck . This'll prompt if you hit a DCHECK in release builds
and hopefully help isolate crashes before the fact.
-Scott
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> THIS MAIL APPLIES TO YOU
> Flakiness is growi
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> * Yes, even purify, valgrind, and reliability bot redness. If you can't
> figure out what to do with these, try pinging erikkay for purify issues and
> huanr for reliability issues. (Not sure who a good general valgrind contact
> is.)
I'm w
Oops...I failedit's actually src/webkit/tools/layout_tests
Also the file uses an underscore, not a dash...it's test_expectations.txt
J
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> src/webkit/tools/data/layout_tests
> btw, run_layout_tests.* can be used to run stuff (and lint the e
src/webkit/tools/data/layout_tests
btw, run_layout_tests.* can be used to run stuff (and lint the exceptions
file)
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Paul Wicks wrote:
>
> Maybe this is a stupid question, but where can I find
> test-expectations.txt? I looked in the tree and didn't see it.
>
> -Pa
Maybe this is a stupid question, but where can I find
test-expectations.txt? I looked in the tree and didn't see it.
-Paul Wicks
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>>
>> Do we have a list of flakey tests? I feel like we
Ojan is working on the tool for the layout tests. First bits are
already checked in.
:DG<
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Do we have a list of flakey tests? I feel like we used to have one...
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
>>
>> THIS MAIL APPLIES
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Do we have a list of flakey tests? I feel like we used to have one...
Every test in test-expectations.txt marked PASS FAIL or PASS FAIL CRASH or
some similar set of multiple expectations is flaky, or at least thought to
be so.
PK
--~--~--
Do we have a list of flakey tests? I feel like we used to have one...
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> THIS MAIL APPLIES TO YOU
>
> Flakiness is growing. Smash it before it gets bigger, and keep it smashed.
>
> ***
>
> The MOST IMPORTANT section in this gigantic mail:
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo