Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015)

2009-12-15 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew. I have included your original question and my response below. Since I have not heard from you in quite a while, I will archive the case on Thursday; we can, of course, reopen it if you require that. Your original question from October 01: I refer here to the access control

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015)

2009-11-22 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 18:02 +, Bill Wesse wrote: Good morning Andrew - I am resending this email from November 4. I did get the message, but was surprised by the contents and I've been unable to find the time to verify it. -Original Message- From: Bill Wesse Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015)

2009-11-20 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew - I am resending this email from November 4. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606 -Original Message- From:

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015)

2009-11-04 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew - I am resending this email from October 29. Please let me know if this answers your question satisfactorily; if so, I will consider your question resolved. The actual updates for Validate Rights (by the DSA) is done as SYSTEM; however, the access check is performed with

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015)

2009-10-29 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew - I am resending this email from October 20. Please let me know if this answers your question satisfactorily; if so, I will consider your question resolved. The actual updates for Validate Rights (by the DSA) is done as SYSTEM; however, the access check is performed with