If you are even comparing CCIE written with ccna and acrc you have a big
suprise ahead of you...
Fred Flinstone wrote:
> Question For the CCIE written test are the questions laid telling you
> there are two answers..or one or thre...etc to a question like in the CCNA
> and ACRC or do the
What are the specs of the cards installed? Give me a show diag and sho
hardware. show tech also just to check it out. I may require access to it to
check this thing out before making a deal.
Nathan Casassa
Marcio Pugina wrote:
> My compnay has recently posted a 7206 for sale on eBay we paid
>
I think it may be possible when using named access-lists instead of numbered.
STRAND Scott wrote:
> Is it possible to edit only one line of an access list without removing the entire
>ACL. I heard that it is possible now with having
> to cut and paste. Can you advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> __
Atif... it seems nobody answered your question. It is a topic of good
discussion. Lets talk about it.
Nate
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report miscond
I bet because of the way your ISP has it set up you are sourcing from an IP that
is not being routed on the Internet. Do you have a separate IP range for your
serial and gateway address that your ethernet LAN side is? If so, try doing an
extended ping and sourcing your Ethernet IP address and see
Use the Cisco Stack Decoder
J K wrote:
> Hello Group
>
> Does anyone know of the webpage that could decode router errors such as
> stack errors . I have tried on TAC and i know i have seen it before .
>
> But i am not sure if i had seen it on cisco's internal network . That may be
> the case . I
Annex
Sam Adams wrote:
> I am getting a little tired of switching the roll cable between routers.
> What's good and reasonably price solution to this problem?
>
> Opinions welcomed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/g
This is just an idea, but if you disabled port 23, and then enabled Port
Address Translation (PAT) which is the same concept as NAT. I wonder if
that would work . I may try it in my lab later. Let me know if you can
figure something out.
Nathan
Scazz wrote:
> Anyone know how to (or if you ca
Did you get the whitepaper? I have a copy...
Nathan
Eugene Chandler wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does any have the white paper entitled
> "CCIE Bridging", that appeared in the
> January 2000 Certificationzone?
>
> If so, may I get you to email me a copy.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Eugene C.
> [EM
Has anyone here researched the problems that modem manufacturers may be
having now? For years they were making a killing selling newer faster
modems. Now the can't do anything because of POTS limitations. I wonder
how this has affected company profits etc.??
"Diegmueller, Jason (I.T. Dept)" wr
Anyone have an idea how they are going to number the passing certs? Are they
going to continue adding onto the CCIE R/S and CCIE Dial numbers? Or will it be
CCDE with new numbers instead of CCIE Design? It would be nice to start with
new numbers, giving some newer people a chance to have a lower
Anyone have an idea how they are going to number the passing certs? Are they
going to continue adding onto the CCIE R/S and CCIE Dial numbers? Or will it be
CCDE with new numbers instead of CCIE Design? It would be nice to start with
new numbers, giving some newer people a chance to have a lower
It is something I do to my finger nails when troubleshooting a big problem...
Andy Harding wrote:
> > thought that it was 2 hex characters- hence the hex reverse of each nibble
> > in Ethernet to Token Ring bridging conversion
> >
> > failing that a sub-byte portion of a multi-byte string for ma
I really don't think the survey would have anything to do with your score. I
would find that very hard to believe that Cisco would punish people for not
filling out a survey...however I would find it more then natural for them to
punish people by not knowing the material by flunking them...
Natha
>From Cisco:
Dear Sir:
The survey does not affect your Exam score whatsoever.
If you have further concerns, please contact us directly at 1.800.829.6387,
option 2,1.
Best Regards.
Rich Russell wrote:
> OK, this is the 2nd time that I've flunked this test. The thing that really
> gets me is
15 matches
Mail list logo