Re: Design Challoenge - a bit off topic [7:195]

2001-04-10 Thread John Neiberger
Thoughts inline below | Howard's comment brings to mind a problem my Design Engineer raised when | responding to a customer RFI. | | Howard's comment: . (Pause for usual mystification on why someone wants | routing protocols to pass through | a firewall, a fairly frequent question). |

RE: Design Challoenge - a bit off topic [7:195]

2001-04-12 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Ok - only solution we could come up with pending better customer information or a better design idea: Internet-edgerouter---firewallinside Recall that there are two internet connections terminating on the edge router. Policy routing on the edge router interface connecting to th

RE: Design Challoenge - a bit off topic [7:195]

2001-04-12 Thread John Neiberger
How about this... Since the exit point is based on destination address, could you use floating static routes? For example... ip route 255.255.255.255 50 ip route 255.255.255.255 100 ip route 255.255.25.255 50 ip route 255.255.25.255 100 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 50 ip route 0.0.0.0 0

RE: Design Challoenge - a bit off topic [7:195]

2001-04-12 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Ok - only solution we could come up with pending better customer information >or a better design idea: > >Internet-edgerouter---firewallinside > >Recall that there are two internet connections terminating on the edge >router. > >Policy routing on the edge router interface connect