Hi,
I have a pair of Cisco ASR1001 routers, both running 15.1(3)S2
(UNIVERSALK9_NPE-M). Both are configured similarly, their role is as BGP edge
device on a service provider network.
Netflow exports are configured on both routers, but only working on one. The
relevant, simple configuration i
Andy Davidson wrote:
> Seemingly without a config change, there are some sessions which refuse to
> establish, because of a bgp notification :
> %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor XXX 2/3 (BGP identifier wrong)
> 4 bytes XXX
> The router-id has not been changed - it was us
Minzhi (Catherine) Wu wrote:
> Seems it is a Cisco bug,
>
> ..following error message: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 1::1 passive
> 2/3 (BGP identifier wrong) 4 bytes 0103 Conditions...Workaround: Enter
> the clear ip bgp command. *CSCsy29534...
> 06 Oct 2009 -
> www.cisco.com/en/US
Hi,
I have a Cisco 6509 with SUP720-3BXL. It has over a hundred bgp peers
configured, two full tables, 4 ibgp, several peerings at an IXP.
Seemingly without a config change, there are some sessions which refuse to
establish, because of a bgp notification :
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from nei
s about
aggregate flows to your target peers.
There are open source and commercial tools which can do this. Poke me
off list if you need specific info.
Best wishes,
Andy
--
Regards, Andy Davidson +44 (0)20 7993 1700 www.netsumo.com
NetSumo Specialist networks consultancy
On 5 Dec 2007, at 17:33, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 12:06:54PM -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I believe that the PIX/ASA configuration can
>> be seen via the internal web server. It's encrypted via SSL, so a
>> wget should work, if it's compiled with SSL
