Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-05 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote: " out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer greatly." I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it can impact the router perfor

Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-04 Thread arulgobinath emmanuel
" out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer greatly." I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it can impact the router performance & buffer space. Gobinath On Tue, Apr 5, 2011

Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-04 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Mark Mason wrote: We are planning on terminating dual OC3 point-to-point circuits (PA-POS-2OC3) from different carriers on 7201 NPE-G2's at two of our DC's and do either HDLC CEF per packet load-balancing or multilink PPP bundle together. What are some of the questions and

[c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-04 Thread Mark Mason
We are planning on terminating dual OC3 point-to-point circuits (PA-POS-2OC3) from different carriers on 7201 NPE-G2's at two of our DC's and do either HDLC CEF per packet load-balancing or multilink PPP bundle together. What are some of the questions and responses from the field for anyone who