The OPTIONS Ping will come across in the regular SIP stack (TCP:5060/TCP:5061
or UDP:5060 typically). Prioritization is a Quality of Service technique and
not an Access Control technique. I don't think a standard ACL would look at the
application layer header to differentiate SIP messages and of
Thanks Charles. Rehosted Unity licenses to unity server w/added
encryption license and Unity is happy again.
Weird it worked fine for a week before throwing a licensing error.
Erick
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Erick Bergquist wrote:
> FWIW,
>
> This is the only paragraph in the CUC 11.5
FWIW,
This is the only paragraph in the CUC 11.5 SU3 release notes.
Encryption is disabled on CUC at moment.
In earlier releases, by default encryption was enabled on Cisco Unity
Connection. However, Unity Connection 11.5(1) SU3 and later allows you
to enable or disable the encryption on restrict
I would expect that would work, rehosting the licenses over to CUC. I've
had to do that in similar circumstances where we needed to upgrade CUC
before CUCM. Either that or build a dedicated PLM and rehost the licenses
there, kinda your choice. It does take up an extra vCPU that is sometimes
not
Ok, I was thinking about it being that. Should have stuck to CUC 11.5.1 SU2.
It was working fine for a week. Weird.
So I wonder if I can rehost the licenses to Unity Connection 11.5 SU3
and have CUCM 11.0 talk to PLM on unity connection 11.5.1 SU3 fine?
PLM is co-located on CUCM 11.0 right now
11.5.1su3 requires PLM 11.5.1su2, due to the change with the encryption
license:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/11_5_1_SU2/releasenotes/cplm_b_release-notes-cplm-1151su2/cplm_b_release-notes-cplm-1151su2_chapter_01.html
Look at the first Note.
YMMV, but I ran into a
Anyone having any issues with CUC 11.5.1 SU3 and PLM on a 11.0.1?
(thinking about rehosting licenses to the 11.5.1 SU3 CUC node)
It has been working fine for a week since the upgrade and today CUC
threw a license error.
PLM 11.0 shows a "Application Error" for the Unity Connection instance.
I d
I should have looked at that link a bit closer, it doesn't mention the cop
file:
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/CleanupCommonCOPfilev1.4.pdf
Which is the 3rd method, but there is a caveat, so read it closely.
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> There
There is!
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_CM_L2_Upgrade_Disk_Space_issues#Free_Up_Space_for_Unified_CM_L2_Upgrade.C2.A0
That entire page is good reading.
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Are there instructions on how to free up disk space?
>
> Sent from my iPho
Are there instructions on how to free up disk space?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Erick Bergquist
mailto:erick...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I've done a few dozen inplace upgrades of CUCM, Unity, UCCX with existing VMs
with no real issues over the past few years. Talking 8.x to 10
Hi Saranyan,
thanks! I would like to know how can I compose an access-list to detect SIP
option ping and prioritize it.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, saranyan k wrote:
> Hi Ki Wi,
>
> OPTIONS ping is a SIP message. Ideally the transport mode of the message
> is TCP or UDP based on the con
Hi Ki Wi,
OPTIONS ping is a SIP message. Ideally the transport mode of the message is
TCP or UDP based on the configuration done under voice service voip -> sip.
Otherwise, we can configure a keepalive profile so that we can specify the
mode of transport for the OPTIONS keepalive messages.
!
voi
I've done a few dozen inplace upgrades of CUCM, Unity, UCCX with existing
VMs with no real issues over the past few years. Talking 8.x to 10.x or
11.x or 9.x to 10/11.x.
Issues encountered:
Freeing up disk space on existing VM for the RU/SU to install on a few
upgrades (more of a slow down)
Rec
Hi Group,
I would like to find out if SIP option ping is a "ping" or a "sip message" ?
>From the documents, it seems like it is a sip messages.
My customer is facing issue with the dial-peers getting busy out during WAN
congestion. We would like to prioritize those messages as a WAN
provider but
14 matches
Mail list logo
