I've used try-let (link below) for this, it's worked great!
https://github.com/rufoa/try-let
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated
I'm curious how others handle this use case, which I feel should be pretty
common.
Given you have a series of business process steps, where the flow is too
complex for the arrow macros, and you also like to name the step results
descriptively, so you use let:
(let [a (do-a ...)
b (do-b .
I could indeed, but if it fails, what does the report look like ? Does it
display the output of `st/test` (which contains all details, notably args,
return and smallest input ?
Khalid aka DjebbZ
@Dj3bbZ
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Beau Fabry wrote:
> Can't you just assert on the return val
Other than spotting an issue with yada which involved upgrading aleph
(https://github.com/juxt/yada/issues/199) and an issue with ClojureScript
with was fixed on master I haven't encountered any problems. All our
integration tests pass. Good luck with bringing Clojure 1.9.0 out the door!
On Thu
On 28/09/17 16:00, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Clojure 1.9 has been quite stable throughout the alpha period, and we
> now hope to release after a very short beta. Please test your existing
> programs on the latest beta (see below), and respond on this thread ASAP
> if you discover anything you believ