Yes, this is some very simple sugar atop simple-check, Reid is owed most of
the credit here.
On Oct 30, 2013 10:44 PM, Alex Baranosky alexander.barano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Zach for this cool testing library, and thanks Reid for
simple-check!
--
--
You received this message because you
It's relatively rare that people write variants of Clojure data structures.
Partially, this is because the existing data structures are quite good,
but it's also because it's surprisingly difficult. Clojure's vectors,
sets, and maps each implement about a dozen interfaces with overlapping
Thanks Zach for this cool testing library, and thanks Reid for simple-check!
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
This looks like a really useful library, but I mostly came here to say +1
for the use of lacunae. Now I have to find a way to insert that into my
own conversations.
On 31 October 2013 15:13, Zach Tellman ztell...@gmail.com wrote:
It's relatively rare that people write variants of Clojure data
