The first solution looks good. I had no idea that wrapping a defn
inside of let's would leave the function exposed. Interesting. Is it
considered idiomatic though?
On May 30, 2:16 pm, Erik Söhnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not really mechanisms, but two Idioms will help you with your problem:
> Either w
Hi,
Not really mechanisms, but two Idioms will help you with your problem:
Either wrap the defn in a let:
(let [U (gen-matrix [1 2 2 -2 -1 -2 2 2 3] 3 3)
A (gen-matrix [1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 3] 3 3)
D (gen-matrix [-1 -2 -2 2 1 2 2 2 3] 3 3)
S (gen-vector [3 4 5])]
(letfn [(prims-fro
Hi all,
I'm running into a problem where I need to define several functions
and/or vars inside another function, but the function has multiple
definitions and they all need to have access to the inner things.
This could be solved by making private functions and using partial,
but this sounds like
