On 09.01.11 22:48:34, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
> > > I don't really understand why you want to get the LOCATION from your
> > > target, anyway, the get_target_property works fine if you use
> > > set_target_properties before it. [...]
> >
> > ...but SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES() doesn't work fine if
At Sun, 9 Jan 2011 16:50:35 -0500,
Martin O'Brien wrote:
>
> Sorry, Nizar - I unintentionally hijacked the thread. I wasn't commenting
> on your problem.
>
> My bad,
>
> mm
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nizar Khalifa Sallem [mailto:nksal...@laas.fr]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 4
Sorry, Nizar - I unintentionally hijacked the thread. I wasn't commenting
on your problem.
My bad,
mm
-Original Message-
From: Nizar Khalifa Sallem [mailto:nksal...@laas.fr]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 4:49 PM
To: Martin O'Brien
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Restrictions
At Sun, 9 Jan 2011 16:27:05 -0500,
Martin O'Brien wrote:
>
> Thanks, Michael.
>
>
> Hmm. I wonder what it is then, and why just today?
>
>
> mm
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Hertling
> Sent: Sunday
Thanks, Michael.
Hmm. I wonder what it is then, and why just today?
mm
-Original Message-
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Hertling
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 4:27 PM
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Restrictions on wher
On 01/09/2011 09:47 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
> At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100,
> Michael Hertling wrote:
>>
>> On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>> On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM,
On 01/09/2011 09:32 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
> At Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:09:37 +0100,
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>
>> [1 ]
>> On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>> On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100,
Michael Hertling wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >> On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> >>> On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm havin
Is anyone else besides me getting TWO e-mails with every post today (perhaps
just on this thread).
The first one looks like this - ~ 1KB and empty.
The second one looks like a regular post.
Thanks,
mm
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Mi
On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
>>> On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
for a bi
At Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:09:37 +0100,
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> > > On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the run
On 09.01.11 21:09:37, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> > > On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
>
On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> > On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
> > > for a binary. Its an executable target named 'setup'
On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
> > for a binary. Its an executable target named 'setup' and I'd like to put it
> > into the top-level directory.
On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael Hertling wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
> > for a binary. Its an executable target named 'setup' and I'd like to put it
> > into the top-level directory.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Quick question here:
>
> I have a couple of libraries here which all need NetCDF, so I was
> thinking the cleanest solution would be to write one FindNetCDF.cmake
> and use it everywhere. What's the policy of including modules into the
> offic
On 01/09/2011 12:58 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
> for a binary. Its an executable target named 'setup' and I'd like to put it
> into the top-level directory. Unfortunately it always ends up in the bin/
> directory, w
Hi,
I'm having a bit of a problem here changing the runtime output directory
for a binary. Its an executable target named 'setup' and I'd like to put it
into the top-level directory. Unfortunately it always ends up in the bin/
directory, which is what CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY is being set to
2011/1/9 Nico Schlömer :
> Quick question here:
>
> I have a couple of libraries here which all need NetCDF, so I was
> thinking the cleanest solution would be to write one FindNetCDF.cmake
> and use it everywhere. What's the policy of including modules into the
> official CMake branch?
http://www
19 matches
Mail list logo
