A selfish request: would it be possible to slip this into the 3.5
release? This is something that I (and the company I work for) are
very interested in, and I would like to avoid pulling a fork into our
workstream.
Cheers,
Steve
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Gilles Khouzam
wrote:
> Hi Yi-Long
I downloaded cmake 3.5.0-rc1 to try it out.
The Windows installation doesn’t appear to provide all the required
dependencies. ‘cmake-gui’ will not launch and provides the error
“Qt5Widgets.dll is missing form your computer.” Do I need to install a specific
Qt runtime before installing cmake 3.5
Hi,
I have been able to replicate the problem with the Windows installer
not properly installing the Qt libraries. I have tested the Linux
x86_64 binaries on a Ubuntu 12.04 machine and everything works, but I
will locate a RHEL machine and see if I can replicate your issue.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at
The window for new CMake 3.5 features is closed now that we have
started the release cycle.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Roman Wüger wrote:
> @Brad, @Clinton: Could we add this feature into CMake 3.5.0, because on
> newer Mac OS systems the package maker is already deprecated and for those
>
Hello all,
I am trying to sort out a project with multiple layers of dependencies and I am
trying to figure out the "right" way of configuring things.
First easy question: Should a value xyz_LIBRARIES contain target names, or
library file locations?
Second question: Should a FindXYZ.cmake file
On 02/03/2016 11:19 AM, Thompson, KT wrote:
> The Windows installation doesn’t appear to provide all the
> required dependencies. ‘cmake-gui’ will not launch and provides
> the error “Qt5Widgets.dll is missing form your computer.”
Ugh, after months of working correctly on the nightly binary builds
On 02/03/2016 11:19 AM, Thompson, KT wrote:
> On RHEL 6.7, I extracted the prebuilt x86_64 binaries from the
> downloaded .tar.gz file. At the end of the configuration process,
> cmake issues a segmentation fault and no Makefiles are generated.
What project are you configuring?
Can you provide a
I'm working on a reproducer. For now, all I can say is that it looks like the
segmentation fault occurs on this command:
install( EXPORT foo-targets
DESTINATION foo
EXPORT_LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES )
-kt
-Original Message-
From: Brad King [mailto:brad.k...@kitware.com]
Sent: Wednes
If my package is installed to a non-standard location, my
Config.cmake file is currently also installed to the non-standard
location and can't be found by dependent projects.
I see that there's export(PACKAGE ), but this creates an entry in
the registry for the build location of the PROJECT rather
Hello Gilles,
Thanks for you mail. It is really useful to me but I encounter an error. My
use case is to use clang-cl with my own target instead of x86/x64 target.
Therefore I don't want to include any headers of VS x86/x64 and use any
library of VS x86/x64:
PS > cmake -G "Visual Studio 14 2015"
Thanks Domen! The use of original-case for in
CPACK_RPM__ was indeed the problem. I never did get the
CPACK_RPM_*_PACKAGE_PREFIX variable to work but I'm using a different
(probably more correct) approach that gets me what I wanted.
Can this use of mixed case-sensitive/all-upper-case can be c
Hello Gilles,
Here it is:
PS > cmake -G "Visual Studio 14 2015" -T v140_clang_3_7
-DLLVM_PATH="E:\\llvm" -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION=8.1
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="E:\\e2tools\\ext-tools\\llvm\\clang-cl.exe"
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="E:\\e2tools\\ext-tools\\llvm\\clang-cl.exe" ..\src\
-- The CXX compiler identi
Hi Yi-Hong,
Can you try to add the following: -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION=8.1 to your parameters?
From: Yi-Hong Lyu [mailto:b95705...@ntu.edu.tw]
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 11:11
To: Gilles Khouzam
Cc: Nicholas Braden ; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there any way to use clang-cl with
On Wednesday, February 03, 2016 13:08:42 Andrew Bell wrote:
> If my package is installed to a non-standard location, my
> Config.cmake file is currently also installed to the non-standard
> location and can't be found by dependent projects.
>
> I see that there's export(PACKAGE ), but this creates
On 4 February 2016 at 04:45, Adam Rankin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I am trying to sort out a project with multiple layers of dependencies and
> I am trying to figure out the “right” way of configuring things.
>
>
>
> First easy question: Should a value xyz_LIBRARIES contain target names, or
> l
Meet the fresh update online installers (CMake3.5.3.5.20160203):
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/cmake-master-win32-online.exe
and
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/cmake-master-win64-online.exe
If you have used them previously, then just update via "CMake Maintenance Tool".
These installers were
Hi Yi-Hong,
I think that this is an issue that was recently fix in CMake which is not in
our fork. I’ll look at pulling in this change in our branch.
From: Yi-Hong Lyu [mailto:b95705...@ntu.edu.tw]
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 11:46
To: Gilles Khouzam
Cc: Nicholas Braden ; cmake@cmake.org
Ok, that makes sense to me. What I’m seeing though, is that find modules and
xyzConfig files for some software packages do not make a variable available
that contains just target names. Xyz_LIBRARIES contains full path file
locations.
This is my immediate frustration with leptonica for example.
Hi Yi-Hong,
I’ve updated our branch to include the fix to not require the Windows 10 SDK.
But I think that I misunderstood what you had meant by Clang-CL.
The support I added was for Clang with the Microsoft CodeGen engine which is
included in Visual Studio 2015 Update 1, what’s where the v140_
Hi Nicolas.
Last time I asked for something like that, it was rejected:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13020
But maybe the stance could change on that? After all, I don't think CMake
would want to cater for every possible postprocessing anyone needs. Perhaps
it could be considered if a
Hi Vadtec.
*The* standard CMake way of dealing with building your dependencies is the
ExternalProject module (
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/ExternalProject.html ). It's a
huge beast, but I belive there are some examples and tutorials available
out there.
The gist is: you create a to
21 matches
Mail list logo