Is it possible to use a different name in place of CMakeLists.txt ?
I am considering using CMake, but I want to conform the to one of the
boost guidelines at
http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html
In particular, under the heading
Directory Structure and Filenames
the followi
If one looks at the documentation
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/project.html
one sees
project( [LANGUAGES] [...])
and the following text: 'By default C and CXX are enabled if no language
options are given.'
It there a list of available languages ?
I have a project that has
/2017 05:37 AM, Brad Bell wrote:
If one looks at the documentation
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/project.html
one sees
project( [LANGUAGES] [...])
and the following text: 'By default C and CXX are enabled if no
language options are given.'
It there a list of available
The CMakeLists.txt command
option( "help string describing option" [initial
value] )
Provides an option for the user to select as ON or OFF; i.e., a BOOL.
How does one provide an option for the user to select that is a PATH ?
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
Would someone please point me to the specifications for CMAKE_C_FLAGS
and CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS in
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html
(or perhaps for CMAKE_C_FLAGS_ and CMAKE_CXX_FLAG_ where
is DEBUG or RELEASE).
These flags are used by the Modules distributed with CMAKE, but I c
I have the same problem. The reason for the problem is that I am
comparing the speed of the exact same source code compiled by C and C++.
I have heard folk lore that C is faster, so I want an automated test to
check for this for an arbitrary hardware and compiler.
What I did was to create two
I am trying to build a project for Red-hat 6 which uses the following
cmake version
bradbell@gorst trash]$ cmake --version
cmake version 2.6-patch 4
While doing so I am having trouble with the ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET. To be
specifc, after building a custom target, cmake seems to forget it has
On 01/16/2013 02:21 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:01 PM, wrote:
The problem is that the script fails when using cmake 2.6. I want to know
if this is expected or a bug ?
I filed a bug report with Red-Hat 6, but they just decided to ignore it. See
https://b
My goal is to use some new c++11 features if they are available,
otherwise to stick to the c++03 features. I need to build test programs
that check for correctness as well as distribute an include file library.
Is there a way in cmake to detect if c++11 is available and to use it
when it is av
I am using FindBoost in a cmake script
to determine if certain components of the boost package are available on the
target system.
If so, the script builds examples that use my package with boost.
If not, these example are not built and tested.
When the target system does not have boost, the us
CMake version 3.10.2 seems to have the problem and it seems to be fixed in
3.13.4.
Thanks
On 9/23/19 6:14 AM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On 23/09/2019 14:05, Brad Bell wrote:
When the target system does not have boost, the user gets the warning:
CMake Warning at /usr/share/cmake-3.10/Modules
11 matches
Mail list logo