Bill Hoffman escreveu:
anything like this. I am hoping it won't happen again. This really
has nothing to do with the current technical argument. It is about a
pattern of behavior that has been going on for years now. If I thought
That's fine. I wrote that this would be a 'regrettable dec
Rodolfo Lima wrote:
Ben Ratzlaff escreveu:
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
Sometimes in the heat of an argument one can make a regrett
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ben Ratzlaff wrote:
> Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
> steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
> happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
Yes, there was more, as Bill told me at FOSDEM.
Ale
Ben Ratzlaff escreveu:
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
Sometimes in the heat of an argument one can make a regrettable
decision. I mea
On 2008-03-04 19:36-0300 Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
Bill Hoffman escreveu:
This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
conc
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mai
I hate to be drawn into this, but I agree with Rodolfo that banning
may be overly harsh. One important thing Brandon was reasonably
restrained at was personal attacks. He generally argued on issues and
though not everybody agreed he was arguing on issues that always
mattered, he generally refrained
Bill Hoffman wrote:
This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
conclusion that Brandon needs to be kicked off the list.
Somet
On 04.03.08 17:21:08, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
> situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
> disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
> conclusion that Brandon needs to be
Bill Hoffman escreveu:
This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
conclusion that Brandon needs to be kicked off the list.
We
This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
conclusion that Brandon needs to be kicked off the list.
I hope we can put this iss
11 matches
Mail list logo
