The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12288
==
Reported By:Ivan Neeson
Assigned To:
On 06/17/2011 05:09 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> I improved it somewhat, so IMO it is basically working now.
> There is now a branch UsingCMakeLikePkgConfig on stage.
> Would be nice if you could have a look.
The patch series is hard to follow because it adds and removes
some code/comments and
On 06/17/2011 12:55 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
>> On 06/16/2011 04:15 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>> I'll push a branch to the stage once 2.8.5 is released. Or can I do that
>>> earlier ?
>>
>> You can push it any time but skip merging it.
>
> The
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12289
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
On Monday 20 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 12:55 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
> >> On 06/16/2011 04:15 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >>> I'll push a branch to the stage once 2.8.5 is released. Or can I do
> >>> that earlier ?
> >>
> >
On Monday 20 June 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
...
> What is the recommended way how to do this with git ?
with "how to do this" I mean "how to make the suggested fixes"
Alex
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.
On 06/20/2011 12:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
>> - In the documentation patch please move mention of this variable down
>> to the bottom. It is not important information for general authors
>> learning the command. Certainly this information does
On 06/20/2011 07:46 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 12:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
>> What is the recommended way how to do this with git ?
>>
>> Simply add one more commit which does that or do I have to do something with
>> rebase --interactive ?
>> How does that play together with
On Monday 20 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
...
> As you guessed, interactive rebase is the correct approach. Since
> you have not merged the topic you are free to overwrite it on the
> topic stage. The old version of the history will be replaced with
> the new version. It might feel funny the firs
On 06/20/2011 05:14 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hmm, I think I managed the rebasing, but now git complains when I try to push:
>
> hammer:~/src/CMake/CMake-git$ git push stage HEAD
> To g...@public.kitware.com:stage/cmake.git
> ! [rejected]HEAD -> DisableSwitchForFindPackage (non-fast
On Monday 20 June 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
> ...
>
> > As you guessed, interactive rebase is the correct approach. Since
> > you have not merged the topic you are free to overwrite it on the
> > topic stage. The old version of the history will be
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12293
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
On Monday 20 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 12:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Monday 20 June 2011, Brad King wrote:
> >> - In the documentation patch please move mention of this variable down
> >>
> >> to the bottom. It is not important information for general authors
> >>
13 matches
Mail list logo