On Tue, Jan 22, 2013, at 07:54 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> That just repeats the question - as I said (and you quoted), "are the
> docs just lying?" The point is that I prefer not to guess. I would like
> to be told officially that on iOS (not Mac OS X) these classes are doing
> ARC-__weak references
That just repeats the question - as I said (and you quoted), "are the docs just
lying?" The point is that I prefer not to guess. I would like to be told
officially that on iOS (not Mac OS X) these classes are doing ARC-__weak
references under ARC when asked for weak behavior. m.
On Jan 22, 2013
On 10 Dec 2012, at 20:26, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> Bump. I'd still like to hear about this. The docs have a *huge* box saying
> that iOS NSPointerArray is not doing __weak references, but it sure looks to
> me like it is. But I don't know how to test. Thanks for any help. m.
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2
Bump. I'd still like to hear about this. The docs have a *huge* box saying that
iOS NSPointerArray is not doing __weak references, but it sure looks to me like
it is. But I don't know how to test. Thanks for any help. m.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:51:57 -0800, Matt Neuburg said:
>The docs for NSPoi
The docs for NSPointerArray say, in a big bold box right at the top:
> Important: NSPointerArray does not support weak references under Automatic
> Reference Counting (ARC).
However, a [NSPointerArray weakObjectsPointerArray] does NULL an element that
has been released through ARC; I can test t
