On Oct 13, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Jon Hull wrote:
You don't need proxies or NSProxy for this. You can just use a
delegate. Off the cuff, I might consider implementing a protocol
on your immutable objects for methods like "currentLocation" and
"currentPlayer" which vector through a semi-global
The project is a game engine which has 2 graphs. The first is a tree
of events that represent the story. Each "event" in the story is an
immutable object, and there is a special event which represents a
series of events to run in order and one which represents branches
that the player has to
The project is a game engine which has 2 graphs. The first is a tree
of events that represent the story. Each "event" in the story is an
immutable object, and there is a special event which represents a
series of events to run in order and one which represents branches
that the player has to
Yes, well it is fairly complex... but it looks like core data is
not a good fit since a basic requirement is that I need it to store
nested arrays of immutable objects and keep the order (I also need
to allow those objects to be inserted at multiple points in the
array). The immutability a
On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Jon Hull wrote:
3) What is the best way of connecting objects from different
stores? I am considering giving them UUIDs and then storing that as
a reference. Then setting a transient property based on that in -
awakeFromFetch. Alternatively, I could store it a
Ok, let me ask some more specific questions and see if that gets a
response... Feel free to respond if you only know the answer to 1 or
2 of these.
1) Can I count on a to-many relationship keeping the order of the
managedObjects it points to? The order is very important in this
case, and I need
On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jon Hull wrote:
I have spent the last 48 hours (re)reading core data docs. My head
is swimming in docs.
Understandable. It's a complicated technology (especially when you
consider its interaction with Bindings).
The short answer is yes, I understand to giv
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:46 PM, I. Savant wrote:
On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jon Hull wrote:
1) Can I count on a to-many relationship keeping the order of the
managedObjects it points to? The order is very important in this
case, and I need a way to ensure that the order does not change
wh
On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jon Hull wrote:
1) Can I count on a to-many relationship keeping the order of the
managedObjects it points to? The order is very important in this
case, and I need a way to ensure that the order does not change when
the object is saved and reloaded.
No. Thi
