n3nash commented on pull request #2012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2012#issuecomment-841601332
@vinothchandar We have found a way to avoid `BaseAvroPayloadWithSchema`. We
are validating some more corner cases with respect to schema evolution in the
PR @nsivabalan has pointed
n3nash commented on pull request #2012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2012#issuecomment-835486764
At a high level, my understanding is there are 3 issues
1. Removing namespace could cause backwards compatibility -> Validated with
[this](https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/
n3nash commented on pull request #2012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2012#issuecomment-809974270
@sathyaprakashg Can you rebase this PR ? I'll wait for sometime before I'll
give it a shot by myself.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
n3nash commented on pull request #2012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2012#issuecomment-693155102
@sathyaprakashg thanks for the explanation, please update the PR
accordingly, rebase and squash the commits.
This i
n3nash commented on pull request #2012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2012#issuecomment-688954187
@sathyaprakashg Thanks for looking into this. I see that the
`org.apache.spark.sql.avro.SchemaConverters` uses the `fixed` name so it's
difficult to workaround it. Your approach sou
n3nash commented on pull request #2012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2012#issuecomment-685269655
@sathyaprakashg Looks good to me. Can you please see why the build is
failing ?
This is an automated message from t
