xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #5624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5624#discussion_r817035988
##
File path: drivers/input/ajoystick.c
##
@@ -722,6 +720,19 @@ static int ajoy_poll(FAR struct file *filep, FAR struct
pollfd *fds,
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #5658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5658
## Summary
1.Move tg_membe allocation to group_alloc
2.Merge group_deallocate to group_release
## Impact
Code refactor only
## Testing
Pass CI and local test
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5658#issuecomment-1055951392
@xiaoxiang781216
Hmm, sabre-6quad:knsh has an issue.
```
$ qemu-system-arm -semihosting -M sabrelite -m 1024 -smp 4 -kernel ./nuttx
-nographic
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5641:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5641#issuecomment-1055957021
@GUIDINGLI
Could you rebase your branch to the latest master?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
no1wudi commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056033742
> The errors are still the same. We are loosing compilation flags for
compiler libs
Maybe, but compilation passed on my local machine with latest
gcc-arm-none-ea
no1wudi opened a new pull request #1037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1037
## Summary
Add .context to ignore
## Impact
## Testing
CI
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056049809
> > The errors are still the same. We are loosing compilation flags for
compiler libs
>
> Maybe, but compilation passed on my local machine with latest
gcc
no1wudi commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056052568
@pkarashchenko Yes, I got compiling flags like:
```
arm-none-eabi-gcc -c -fno-common -fno-builtin -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wshadow -Wundef -Os -fomit-frame-point
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056053377
@no1wudi but the build fails for `giant-board`. Could you please examine
that case as well?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
no1wudi commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056055658
> @no1wudi but the build fails for `giant-board`. Could you please examine
that case as well?
It also passed on my local machine with latest PR but failed on CI,
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056055658
> @no1wudi but the build fails for `giant-board`. Could you please examine
that case as well?
It also passed on my local machine with latest PR but failed
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056055658
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comme
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#discussion_r817286908
##
File path: boards/arm/imx6/sabre-6quad/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_NOOPT),y)
ARCHOPTIMIZATION += $(MA
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056055658
> @no1wudi but the build fails for `giant-board`. Could you please examine
that case as well?
It also passed on my local machine with latest PR but failed
no1wudi commented on a change in pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#discussion_r817288958
##
File path: boards/arm/imx6/sabre-6quad/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_NOOPT),y)
ARCHOPTIMIZATION += $(MAXOPTIM
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056055658
> @no1wudi but the build fails for `giant-board`. Could you please examine
that case as well?
It also passed on my local machine with latest PR but failed
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #1037:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1037#discussion_r817297839
##
File path: .gitignore
##
@@ -25,5 +25,6 @@
/symtab_apps.c
cscope.out
Make.dep
+.context
Review comment:
which Makefile
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #1037:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1037#discussion_r817297839
##
File path: .gitignore
##
@@ -25,5 +25,6 @@
/symtab_apps.c
cscope.out
Make.dep
+.context
Review comment:
which Makefile
no1wudi commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056109598
@xiaoxiang781216 @pkarashchenko
There is a bug in arm-none-eabi-gcc 9.2 for cortex a that it dont report
libgcc.a correctly for FPU enabled case:
```
gcc-arm-n
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056109598
@xiaoxiang781216 @pkarashchenko
There is a bug in arm-none-eabi-gcc 9.2 for cortex a that it don't report
libgcc.a correctly for FPU enabled case:
```
g
no1wudi opened a new pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659
## Summary
There is a bug in arm-none-eabi-gcc 9.2 for cortex a that it don't report
libgcc.a correctly for FPU enabled case:
```
gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2019-q4-major/bin/arm-none-eabi-gc
no1wudi commented on a change in pull request #1037:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1037#discussion_r817377794
##
File path: .gitignore
##
@@ -25,5 +25,6 @@
/symtab_apps.c
cscope.out
Make.dep
+.context
Review comment:
Not sure it was genera
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056413203
Can we use softfp libs if hardfp are not available?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
no1wudi commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056431517
Yes, but softfp may cause performance issue on these platforms.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056431517
Yes we can, but softfp may cause performance issue on these platforms.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5647#issuecomment-1056484275
@xiaoxiang781216 I think that we can drop dependency on `nuttx/compiler.h`
now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056486117
BTW, we can try moving to GCC11
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
GUIDINGLI commented on pull request #5641:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5641#issuecomment-1056493454
> @GUIDINGLI
>
> Could you rebase your branch to the latest master?
done
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #5660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5660
## Summary
since it is already added in the top level of .gitignore in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5055
## Impact
Minor
## Testing
Pass CI
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #1037:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1037#discussion_r817428618
##
File path: .gitignore
##
@@ -25,5 +25,6 @@
/symtab_apps.c
cscope.out
Make.dep
+.context
Review comment:
from this patc
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056497307
Why this PR is closed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #1037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1037
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5519
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5647#issuecomment-1056502008
> @xiaoxiang781216 I think that we can drop dependency on `nuttx/compiler.h`
now.
I think so before, but assert reference noreturn_function:(.
--
This
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5647#issuecomment-1056508269
> > @xiaoxiang781216 I think that we can drop dependency on
`nuttx/compiler.h` now.
>
> I think so before, but assert reference noreturn_function:(.
pkarashchenko merged pull request #5647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5647
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056517606
Does GCC11 for arm release?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5637#issuecomment-1056522650
I close #5659, it strange that this one is closed too.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056570617
> Does GCC11 for arm release?
https://developer.arm.com/-/media/Files/downloads/gnu/11.2-2022.02/binrel/gcc-arm-11.2-2022.02-x86_64-arm-none-eabi.tar.xz
-
michi-jung opened a new pull request #5661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5661
NuttX' string.h is using the FAR preprocessor definition, which is
defined in nuttx/compiler.h. Thus, it should include it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Jung
--
This is an automa
no1wudi commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056604711
But I only see 10.3 on download page:
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/developer-tools/gnu-toolchain/gnu-rm/downloads
--
This is
no1wudi opened a new pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662
## Summary
Reopen #5637
## Impact
## Testing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056604711
But I only see 10.3 on download page:
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/developer-tools/gnu-toolchain/gnu-rm/downloads
--
This
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056604711
But I only see 10.3 in download page:
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/developer-tools/gnu-toolchain/gnu-rm/downloads
--
This
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056604711
But I only see 10.3 in download page:
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/developer-tools/gnu-toolchain/gnu-rm/downloads
Emm,
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056634500
The button on
jerpelea opened a new pull request #5663:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5663
## Summary
Document licenses found in libs/libc
## Impact
LICENSE
## Testing
NONE
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#issuecomment-1056660366
Should we add softfp flag in case is GCC version is 9 or lower? What do you
think? Also with this PR we drop some parts related to "old" toolchains. I
think we ne
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#issuecomment-1056662309
Also neon flag is dropped. Is this expected?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817500804
##
File path: boards/arm/lpc43xx/bambino-200e/README.txt
##
@@ -111,18 +111,6 @@ ports.
CONFIG_ARCH_FPU=y
CONFIG_ARMV7M_LAZYFPU=
no1wudi commented on pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#issuecomment-1056669540
> Also neon flag is dropped. Is this expected?
It's due to the incomplete SoC feature setting since there is a option
`CONFIG_ARM_HAVE_NEON`, I'll submit new comm
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817503006
##
File path: boards/arm/imx6/sabre-6quad/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_NOOPT),y)
ARCHOPTIMIZATION += $(MA
no1wudi commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817503319
##
File path: boards/arm/lpc43xx/bambino-200e/README.txt
##
@@ -111,18 +111,6 @@ ports.
CONFIG_ARCH_FPU=y
CONFIG_ARMV7M_LAZYFPU=y
-C
no1wudi commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817504494
##
File path: boards/arm/imx6/sabre-6quad/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_NOOPT),y)
ARCHOPTIMIZATION += $(MAXOPTIM
pkarashchenko merged pull request #5660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5660
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056720815
@xiaoxiang781216 seems that after toolchain update CI is not passing anymore
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
pkarashchenko edited a comment on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056720815
@xiaoxiang781216 seems that after toolchain update CI is not passing anymore
```
mmcsd/mmcsd_spi.c:223:28: note: while referencing 'g_mmcsdslot'
no1wudi commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056740504
It seems code check is more strict in this GCC, in this error:
```
/* A slot structure allocated for each configured slot */
static struct mmcsd_slot_s g_mmc
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5661#issuecomment-1056748898
let's ignore the false alarm.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5661
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5663:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5663#issuecomment-1056749316
let's ignore the false alarm
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5663:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5663
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
no1wudi opened a new pull request #5664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5664
## Summary
Remove them to pass CI since they are not really used in board level logic.
## Impact
None
## Testing
CI
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
no1wudi commented on pull request #5659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659#issuecomment-1056753057
@pkarashchenko Please see #5664
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
no1wudi commented on pull request #5664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5664#issuecomment-1056759863
Commit message updated
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5664#issuecomment-1056763093
Let's directly merge this simple patch to unblock CI.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5664
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Ouss4 opened a new pull request #5665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5665
## Summary
Add support for the SPI-Flash for ESP32-S3.
## Impact
New feature -- no impact on existing code.
## Testing
Provided defconfig.
--
This is an automated message from th
masayuki2009 merged pull request #5641:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5641
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5624#discussion_r81760
##
File path: drivers/input/ajoystick.c
##
@@ -722,6 +720,19 @@ static int ajoy_poll(FAR struct file *filep, FAR struct
pollfd *fds,
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5650#issuecomment-1056827391
>Test on qemu sabre-6quad:smp
@zhuyanlinzyl
Did you test this PR with your dual Cortex-A7 platform?
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
pkarashchenko commented on pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#issuecomment-1056831143
> It's due to the incomplete SoC feature setting since there is a option
`CONFIG_ARM_HAVE_NEON`, I'll submit new commit to this PR to keep its origin
flags.
juniskane opened a new pull request #5666:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5666
## Summary
The STM32L4+ has flash data cache and errata documents say this issue
exists, so enable workaround option for those chips.
The "depends on" condition is also simplified t
zhuyanlinzyl commented on pull request #5650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5650#issuecomment-1056833676
Yes, I also have test on dual Cortex-A7 platform @masayuki2009
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
jerpelea opened a new pull request #5667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5667
## Summary
Document licenses found in libs/libc
## Impact
LICENSE
## Testing
NONE
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
gustavonihei opened a new pull request #5668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5668
## Summary
This PR intends to add support for Tickless operation of the NuttX kernel
using the Systimer component.
## Impact
Extended OS support for `esp32s3-devkit` platform.
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5668#discussion_r817661244
##
File path: arch/xtensa/src/esp32s3/esp32s3_tickless.c
##
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/
gustavonihei commented on pull request #929:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/929#issuecomment-1056897731
> @nandojve why to move mcuboot to examples? I think boot/ is a better place
to keep it, what do you think @gustavonihei ? Actually there are many
"examples" i
gustavonihei commented on a change in pull request #5668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5668#discussion_r817665684
##
File path: arch/xtensa/src/esp32s3/esp32s3_tickless.c
##
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/*
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5668#discussion_r817666273
##
File path: arch/xtensa/src/esp32s3/esp32s3_tickless.c
##
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/
gustavonihei commented on a change in pull request #5668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5668#discussion_r817671140
##
File path: arch/xtensa/src/esp32s3/esp32s3_tickless.c
##
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/*
gustavonihei commented on a change in pull request #5668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5668#discussion_r817671140
##
File path: arch/xtensa/src/esp32s3/esp32s3_tickless.c
##
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/*
nandojve commented on pull request #929:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/929#issuecomment-1056917598
Hi Folks,
This change of feelings is that create bad projects. I invested a lot of
time to put things in the correct way and, after weeks, now, it is about
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #5624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5624#discussion_r817692400
##
File path: drivers/input/ajoystick.c
##
@@ -722,6 +720,19 @@ static int ajoy_poll(FAR struct file *filep, FAR struct
pollfd *fds,
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5624#discussion_r817695866
##
File path: drivers/input/ajoystick.c
##
@@ -722,6 +720,19 @@ static int ajoy_poll(FAR struct file *filep, FAR struct
pollfd *fds,
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817698716
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817702007
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2
no1wudi commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817703636
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2 = $(NX
no1wudi commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817704650
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2 = $(NX
gustavonihei commented on pull request #929:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/929#issuecomment-1056941297
> Hi Folks,
>
> This change of feelings is that create bad projects. I invested a lot of
time to put things in the correct way and, after weeks, now, it
gustavonihei edited a comment on pull request #929:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/929#issuecomment-1056941297
> Hi Folks,
>
> This change of feelings is that create bad projects. I invested a lot of
time to put things in the correct way and, after weeks, n
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817699643
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2
no1wudi opened a new pull request #5669:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5669
## Summary
-nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs can't be recognized by gcc 10.3, and already
removed from other socs.
## Impact
phy62xx
## Testing
CI
--
This is an automated messa
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817702007
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2
gustavonihei edited a comment on pull request #929:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/929#issuecomment-1056941297
> Hi Folks,
>
> This change of feelings is that create bad projects. I invested a lot of
time to put things in the correct way and, after weeks, n
no1wudi commented on pull request #5669:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5669#issuecomment-1056952488
@pkarashchenko Please see this PR, we should wait for CI pass to ensure
there don't have other break.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5662#discussion_r817707282
##
File path: boards/arm/phy62xx/phy6222/scripts/Make.defs
##
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ NXFLATLDFLAGS1 = -r -Wl,-d -Wl,-warn-common
NXFLATLDFLAGS2
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #5667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5667#issuecomment-1056955489
Let's ignore the false ci alarm by the new toolchain:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5659
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
501 - 600 of 60871 matches
Mail list logo
