Re: FW: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b53 and JDK 8u60 b05 are available on java.net

2015-03-10 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Great! Thank you for sharing, Steve. - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Looking ahead to Java 9, here's where the builds are up for D/L > > From: Rory O'Donnell > > Subject: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b53 and JDK 8u60 b05 are available on > java.net > > > H

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-11641) root directory quota can be set but can not be clear

2015-03-10 Thread kanaka kumar avvaru (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] kanaka kumar avvaru resolved HADOOP-11641. -- Resolution: Duplicate > root directory quota can be set but can not be clear >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11702) Allow StringSignerSecretProvider to read secret from a file

2015-03-10 Thread Arun Suresh (JIRA)
Arun Suresh created HADOOP-11702: Summary: Allow StringSignerSecretProvider to read secret from a file Key: HADOOP-11702 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11702 Project: Hadoop Common

CfP 10th Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cloud Computing (VHPC '15)

2015-03-10 Thread VHPC 15
= CALL FOR PAPERS 10th Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cloud Computing (VHPC '15) held in conjunction with Euro-Par 2015, August 24-28, Vienna, Austria (Springer LNCS) =

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11701) RPC authentication fallback option should support enabling fallback only for specific connections.

2015-03-10 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
Chris Nauroth created HADOOP-11701: -- Summary: RPC authentication fallback option should support enabling fallback only for specific connections. Key: HADOOP-11701 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP

Re: upstream jenkins build broken?

2015-03-10 Thread Aaron T. Myers
Hey Colin, I asked Andrew Bayer, who works with Apache Infra, what's going on with these boxes. He took a look and concluded that some perms are being set in those directories by our unit tests which are precluding those files from getting deleted. He's going to clean up the boxes for us, but we s

Re: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2015?

2015-03-10 Thread Allen Wittenauer
On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > > Are we okay with breaking other forms of compatibility for Hadoop-3, like > behavior, dependencies, JDK, classpath, environment? I think so. Are we > okay with breaking these forms of compatibility in future Hadoop-2.x? > Likely not. Doe

upstream jenkins build broken?

2015-03-10 Thread Colin P. McCabe
Hi all, A very quick (and not thorough) survey shows that I can't find any jenkins jobs that succeeded from the last 24 hours. Most of them seem to be failing with some variant of this message: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) o

Re: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2015?

2015-03-10 Thread Karthik Kambatla
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > If 3.x is going to be Java 8 & not backwards compatible, I don't expect > anyone wanting to use this in production until some time deep into 2016. > > Issue: JDK 8 vs 7 > > It will require Hadoop clusters to move up to Java 8. While there'

Re: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2015?

2015-03-10 Thread Colin P. McCabe
Er, that should read "as Allen commented" C. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Colin P. McCabe wrote: > Hi Arun, > > Not all changes which are incompatible can be "fixed"-- sometimes an > incompatibility is a necessary part of a change. For example, taking > a really old library dependency with

Re: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2015?

2015-03-10 Thread Colin P. McCabe
Hi Arun, Not all changes which are incompatible can be "fixed"-- sometimes an incompatibility is a necessary part of a change. For example, taking a really old library dependency with known security issues off the CLASSPATH will create incompatibilities, but it's also necessary. A minimum JDK ve

FW: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b53 and JDK 8u60 b05 are available on java.net

2015-03-10 Thread Steve Loughran
Looking ahead to Java 9, here's where the builds are up for D/L From: Rory O'Donnell Subject: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b53 and JDK 8u60 b05 are available on java.net Hi Andrew, Early Access build for JDK 9 b53 available on java.net, summary of changes