On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Incze Lajos wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hen
ri Yandell writes:
I'm +1 to commons-uri.
What about commons-naming?
That's JNDI.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+1
Any timeline for raising codec out of the sandbox?
O'brien, Tim wrote:
Rev 1.1 of Base64 was checked in by Sander Striker about 1 year ago. It was
initially from the HttpClient project.
The codec Base64 class has an open bug which also should point us in the
right direction:
It might need a little time for Tim to get things sorted out.
It's all a bit messy in there.
I guess the question needs to be whether it should focus on new
functionalities or wrapping up enough to goto Commons-proper.
Hen
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Jeffrey Dever wrote:
+1
Any timeline for
+1
Maybe chunked transfer encoding and URL encoding would fit into this
package as well somehow?
Odi
O'brien, Tim wrote:
Rev 1.1 of Base64 was checked in by Sander Striker about 1 year ago. It was
initially from the HttpClient project.
The codec Base64 class has an open bug which also should
Message-
From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a home
Maybe chunked transfer encoding and URL encoding would fit into this
package as well somehow
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a home
Maybe chunked transfer encoding and URL encoding would fit
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:46:23AM -0600, O'brien, Tim wrote:
Rev 1.1 of Base64 was checked in by Sander Striker about 1 year ago. It was
initially from the HttpClient project.
The codec Base64 class has an open bug which also should point us in the
right direction:
My apologies, Scott, my apologies.
Tim O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a home
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003
I tried to read to the end of the thread so far before replying.
If the feeling is that the classes will see more use distributed
separately from HttpClient, I concur with Henri's assessment below.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hen
ri Yandell writes:
I'm +1 to commons-uri.
As Tim points out,
