+1
A little late from me, but development is proceeding very well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
24/07/2003 10:40:30 PM:
+1
-Original Message-
From:
+1
Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2003 8:29 AM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: RE: [VOTE] HttpClient 2.0 RC1
+1
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion
+1
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
24/07/2003 10:40:30 PM:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kalnichevski, Oleg
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
+1 (nonbinding) from me
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
We have had just one (what I see as a real) bug since 2.0 beta2. I think it is time we moved past 'beta' into 'final release' phase with 2.0 branch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Kalnichevski, Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] HttpClient 2.0 RC1
We have had just one (what I see as a real) bug since 2.0 beta2. I think it
is time we moved past 'beta' into 'final rel
[VOTE] HttpClient 2.0 RC1
The only thing that I think should be added is a Javadoc (and perhaps
logging) about the problem with URI.normalize() and relative path URIs.
If people want to start working on creating a release I will probably
have time to update the sites and push the release tonight (~9A
The only thing that I think should be added is a Javadoc (and perhaps
logging) about the problem with URI.normalize() and relative path URIs.
If people want to start working on creating a release I will probably
have time to update the sites and push the release tonight (~9AM now).
In general
Absolutely. +1
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 10:34 PM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
We have had just one (what I see as a real) bug since 2.0 beta2. I
think it is time we moved past 'beta' into 'final release' phase with
2.0 branch
Oleg
--
+1
As our list of bugs for 2.0 target is currently empty and most things
seem documentation and integration issues.
Odi
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
We have had just one (what I see as a real) bug since 2.0 beta2. I
think it is time we moved past 'beta' into 'final release' phase with
2.0 branch
O
+1
-Original Message-
From: Kalnichevski, Oleg
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] HttpClient 2.0 RC1
We have had just one (what I see as a real) bug since 2.0 beta2. I think it is time we
moved past 'beta' into 'final release' phase with 2.0 bra
+1
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 08:34 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
We have had just one (what I see as a real) bug since 2.0 beta2. I
think it is time we moved past 'beta' into 'final release' phase with
2.0 branch
Oleg
-
11 matches
Mail list logo