On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:46:57 -0700
Doug Jones wrote:
> [snip]
> > I like this approach, just remind that as far I see the code and by
> > comments of the devs, the kernel implements the bare just enough to
> > read files, so I think directories are not implemented at all that's
> > why all is on
On Saturday 31 October 2009 02:35:42 Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Doug Jones wrote:
> > (1) Has OpenMoko made the policy decision that filenames will be limited
> > to 8.3?
>
> We're using FAT.
I have a usable grasp of how FAT works, so I figured this would be the ans
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Doug Jones wrote:
> [snip]
>> I like this approach, just remind that as far I see the code and by
>> comments of the devs, the kernel implements the bare just enough to
>> read files, so I think directories are not implemented at all that's
>> why all is on root di
2009/10/30 Doug Jones :
> [snip]
>> I like this approach, just remind that as far I see the code and by
>> comments of the devs, the kernel implements the bare just enough to
>> read files, so I think directories are not implemented at all that's
>> why all is on root directory so at least basic hi
[snip]
> I like this approach, just remind that as far I see the code and by
> comments of the devs, the kernel implements the bare just enough to
> read files, so I think directories are not implemented at all that's
> why all is on root directory so at least basic hierarchical filesystem
> has to
5 matches
Mail list logo
