Hello,
I received my freerunner last weekend, and liking it sofar. I've had a
play with wifi - and although the freerunning sees the networks just
fine (with iwlist eth0 scan) and I can connect to the network as well -
I get a DHCP lease, with nameservers and all, the route is correct too.
How
Derick Rethans wrote:
> I get a DHCP lease, with nameservers and all, the route is correct too.
> However, I can't do any sort of connection - nor ping.
I have a similar problem when I fire up wifi, and it's caused by having two
default routes.
Try "ip r" and see if it lists two default routes -
I've experienced the same thing as the OP. Running Windows as my hosts
means it's a pain to set it up as a router, so I connect via Wifi and
use it for everything. My solution is to put the following in my
/etc/network/interfaces under eth0:
up route del default gw 192.168.0.200
This will remo
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, nickd wrote:
> Joel Newkirk wrote:
> > Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> >> I get a DHCP lease, with nameservers and all, the route is correct too.
> >> However, I can't do any sort of connection - nor ping.
> >>
> >> Try "ip r" and see if it lists two default routes - one out us
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, nickd wrote:
>
>> Joel Newkirk wrote:
>> > Derick Rethans wrote:
>> >
>> >> I get a DHCP lease, with nameservers and all, the route is correct too.
>> >> However, I can't do any sort of connection - nor ping.
>> >>
>> >> Try "ip r" and see if it lists two default routes - one
On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I received my freerunner last weekend, and liking it sofar. I've had a
> play with wifi - and although the freerunning sees the networks just
> fine (with iwlist eth0 scan) and I can connect to the network as well -
> I get a DHCP lease,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Al Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > I received my freerunner last weekend, and liking it sofar. I've had a
> > play with wifi - and although the freerunning sees the networks just
> > fine (with iwlist eth0 scan) and I can connect to th
On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Al Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > > I received my freerunner last weekend, and liking it sofar. I've had a
> > > play with wifi - and although the freerunning sees the networks just
>
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Al Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Al Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > > > I received my freerunner last weekend, and liking it sofar. I've had a
> > > > play with wifi - and
Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> I do, and that's the weirdest part - the rx packet count increases too
> even. I also checked whether it could be a broken resolver, but pinging
> to an IP adres doesn't work either.
Check your AP's firewall is not blocking TCP/IP from the FR, or any other
firewall yo
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Jim Morris wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > I do, and that's the weirdest part - the rx packet count increases too
> > even. I also checked whether it could be a broken resolver, but pinging
> > to an IP adres doesn't work either.
>
> Check your AP's firewall is not
When I was playing with the WLAN on the FreeRunner (about a month ago) I
ran into an issue where my AP thought the FR was in power saving mode
even though the FR didn't think so (or at least iwconfig said it was
off). If I issued a
# iwconfig eth0 power off
that would fix it.
That was with 200
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, -stacy wrote:
> When I was playing with the WLAN on the FreeRunner (about a month ago) I
> ran into an issue where my AP thought the FR was in power saving mode
> even though the FR didn't think so (or at least iwconfig said it was
> off). If I issued a
> # iwconfig eth0 po
13 matches
Mail list logo