Re: [CGUYS] Google: 2nd hit. Bing: Not in 100 hits.

2009-08-01 Thread mike
1% pay... Google's link was on the first page...Bing was 77. On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Alvin Auerbach alvin.auerb...@verizon.netwrote: Google: 2nd hit was what I wanted. I checked the first 100 hits from Bing, and found nothing. I did a find on each Bing page for 1% None of the

Re: [CGUYS] Google: 2nd hit. Bing: Not in 100 hits.

2009-08-01 Thread Tony B
1% own is a really bad search, so let's not blame the search engine. First, it uses the % sign, which is often an operator. But worse, it's too short to get a meaningful response. That Google was able to get it on your first page probably has to do with you having browsed a story about it

[CGUYS] Google: 2nd hit. Bing: Not in 100 hits.

2009-07-31 Thread Alvin Auerbach
Google: 2nd hit was what I wanted. I checked the first 100 hits from Bing, and found nothing. I did a find on each Bing page for 1% None of the first 100 Bing hits had that term. I then stopped checking. Search term: 1% own Google's second hit: World's richest 1% own 40% of all wealth,