David Walser wrote:
> --- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as
> > RESOLVED|INVALID or
> > > do not continue to send email to the list.
> > Whoever changed the state
> > > should still be receiving emails
--- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as
> RESOLVED|INVALID or
> > do not continue to send email to the list.
> Whoever changed the state
> > should still be receiving emails on it... so if it
> needs to be c
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
> do not continue to send email to the list. Whoever changed the state
> should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
> they can handle it.
You want that closed
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 09:14:08PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> Hmm, maybe the person who closed it was wrong...
Problem is a lot of these non-cooker bug report people keep going on
about their bug... Which keeps filling the list with it...
But yeah I can see the problem with wrongly closed bugs.
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:33, Ben Reser wrote:
> Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
> do not continue to send email to the list. Whoever changed the state
> should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
> they can handle it.
>
Hmm, maybe
Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
do not continue to send email to the list. Whoever changed the state
should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
they can handle it.
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"If you're