Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-27 Thread Quel Qun
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > >Would it be possible for you obtain and try the latest GRUB[1], without >> > >any Mandrake patches? That would help narrow down the problem a bit. >> >> >> could you also try

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-27 Thread Pixel
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Would it be possible for you obtain and try the latest GRUB[1], without > > >any Mandrake patches? That would help narrow down the problem a bit. > > > could you also try going to grub's console (with 'c') > and t

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-27 Thread Pixel
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Would it be possible for you obtain and try the latest GRUB[1], without > >any Mandrake patches? That would help narrow down the problem a bit. could you also try going to grub's console (with 'c') and try command "displaymem"

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-26 Thread Quel Qun
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Quel Qun wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Can anyone explain to me why the system boots with 128MB of RAM with lilo and only >64MB with grub? >> Everything seems to work fine when I specify mem=128m, but that's still strange. >> Mandrakely, > >(please understand this

[Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-26 Thread Quel Qun
Hi, Can anyone explain to me why the system boots with 128MB of RAM with lilo and only 64MB with grub? Everything seems to work fine when I specify mem=128m, but that's still strange. Mandrakely, =-= kk1 (Following lines are not from me). -- Linux est libre, et vous ? Devenez