Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > david faure has begun to do some work in that area (in kde's cvs) > > but the road is long before having interactive::qt; > > > > and at that moment, we'll have to check either to use > > interactive::qt or interactive::gtk :-) > > > > the real probl

Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-17 Thread David Walser
--- Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > david faure has begun to do some work in that area > (in kde's cvs) but > the road is long before having interactive::qt; > > and at that moment, we'll have to check either to > use interactive::qt > or interactive::gtk :-) > > the real problem wi

Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > - we already have a code base providing abstraction in the config > > tools for implementation into Gtk, Newt and stdio (interactive) > > That's really cool. Have you all looked at Stormix's abstraction > toolkit? I believe it supported ncurses and g

Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-17 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Sat Aug 17 19:53 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > Having read your reasoning, the idea of replacing Mandrake with RedHat is > loopy, on a server or elsewhere. RedHat offer you less choices than Mandrake. > Mandrake and SuSe, for example, _prefer_ KDE and so write most of their tools > to it. RedH

Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-17 Thread David Walser
--- Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - we already have a code base providing abstraction > in the config > tools for implementation into Gtk, Newt and stdio > (interactive) That's really cool. Have you all looked at Stormix's abstraction toolkit? I believe it supported ncurses and

Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Having read your reasoning, the idea of replacing Mandrake with > RedHat is loopy, on a server or elsewhere. RedHat offer you less > choices than Mandrake. Mandrake and SuSe, for example, _prefer_ KDE > and so write most of their tools to it. RedHat esse

Re: [Cooker] Aurora - the devil's in the details

2002-08-17 Thread Leon Brooks
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:47, Chris Higgins wrote: > Mandrake Linux is what I use on my desktop, I put redhat or > debian on servers. I'm considering dropping Mandrake for my > desktop - and let me take a second to explain why. Having read your reasoning, the idea of replacing Mandrake with RedHat i