[Cooker] bochs installation halt entire installation process

2002-09-18 Thread MdkXpertLst
Hi, bochs-1.4.1-2mdk Installation of bochs halt entire installation process, but killing su xfs -c xfs -port -1 -s /bin/sh (pid 10237 in this case) let installation continue... Here is what is running when this occur: PID RSS %CPU CMD 1 0 0.2 (swapper) 2 0 0.0 (keventd)

Re: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread Meir Faraj
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris I think because of plex 86 project that is in work this week they was able to boot and use linux under a virtual machine !!! ;-)

Re: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread Geoffrey Lee
Yo, On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Meir Faraj wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris I think because of plex 86 project that is in work this week

Re: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread Leon Brooks
Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-: -- I wouldn't touch ActiveX with a 10-foot polecat. I might, however, let

Re: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread Meir Faraj
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Yo, On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Meir Faraj wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris I think because of

Re: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread Meir Faraj
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-: yeh;-)

Re: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread C Y
From: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:40:12 +0200 On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL

RE: [Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-26 Thread Similien, Peri-TPS
-Original Message- From: C Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs From: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17

[Cooker] Bochs

2000-10-25 Thread Chris Spencer
Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris

[Cooker] Bochs purchase

2000-03-22 Thread John Cavan
Hey! Ket me be the first to congratulate Mandrake on two fronts: 1. Buying Bochs 2. LPGL'ing Bochs for the benefit of Plex 86 and the Linux community. Way to go guys, it's great to see a distribution channel giving back to the OSS community in such a great manner. Makes me happy that I