Has anybody put in a request to have the code at
http://atmelwlandriver.sourceforge.net/downloads.html
put in our kernel? A friend of mine says it contains
a fastvnet_cs module needed for his 3com 3CRSHPW696
wireless NIC card.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Fr
Hi all,
Sorry to ask such a basic question, but I was wondering if anyone here
could help me.
I want to upgrade the kernel to 2.4.17.x and get the headers and initscripts
and iptables to match.
Is it safe to upgrade the glibc to the cooker version along with the kernel
and stuff..
I have an i
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Each kernel image in /boot has its own entry in /etc/lilo.conf so you
> can choose at boot time which one to use. But there is also one system
> map for each kernel, produced at compilation, and lilo.conf only allows
> one to be specified... So, what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes:
> Ok, this not specialy a mandrake question, but i did RTFM first, and
> didn't find any answer in Kernel- and LILO-HOWTO, neither in the
> 'running linux' bible :-)
> Each kernel image in /boot has its own entry in /etc/lilo.conf so you
> can choose a
Ok, this not specialy a mandrake question, but i did RTFM first, and
didn't find any answer in Kernel- and LILO-HOWTO, neither in the
'running linux' bible :-)
Each kernel image in /boot has its own entry in /etc/lilo.conf so you
can choose at boot time which one to use. But there is also one syst
> So I really need agpgart module, but it gives a resource busy error when
> trying to load it.
>
> I already managed to use NVidia driver with an older Mandrake.
>
---
I'm not sure this is relevant, but perhaps you could ask the guys at Red
Hat... The beta 6.9.5 works wonderfully with all
Bryan Whitehead a écrit :
>
> The NVIDIA FAQ says this: "Currently internally supported chipsets
> include: Intel 440LX, 440BX, 440GX, 815, 820, and 840. AMD Irongate, VIA
> Apollo Pro133, KX133 and KT133. More chipsets may be supported through the
> use of AGPGART."
>
> So internally the driver
The NVIDIA FAQ says this: "Currently internally supported chipsets
include: Intel 440LX, 440BX, 440GX, 815, 820, and 840. AMD Irongate, VIA
Apollo Pro133, KX133 and KT133. More chipsets may be supported through the
use of AGPGART."
So internally the driver provided by NVIDIA does not need the agp
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
>
> pgeorges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to
> > support AGP ?
> >
> > (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia
> > drivers, but can't load agpgarp module)
>
> Please te
Bryan Whitehead a écrit :
>
> AFAIK NVIDIA has there own APG stuff in their kernel module. It's one of
> the resonse they can't give out the source - they licensed thier APG tech
> from someone else.
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, pgeorges wrote:
>
> > Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1m
AFAIK NVIDIA has there own APG stuff in their kernel module. It's one of
the resonse they can't give out the source - they licensed thier APG tech
from someone else.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, pgeorges wrote:
> Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to
> support AGP ?
pgeorges a écrit :
>
> Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to
> support AGP ?
>
> (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia
> drivers, but can't load agpgarp module)
I successfully used NVidia drivers with precedent Kernel (2.2.16-9mdk)
bu
pgeorges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to
> support AGP ?
>
> (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia
> drivers, but can't load agpgarp module)
Please test 2mdk and let me know.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to
support AGP ?
(I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia
drivers, but can't load agpgarp module)
"Don Krause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed that there seems to be support for the HPT366 UDMA/66 chip that's
> on Abit's MB in one of the kernels on the 7.0, but I didn't see the patch in
> the kernel sources. (makes it a little tough to rebuild your kernel if your
> only drive lives on
I noticed that there seems to be support for the HPT366 UDMA/66 chip that's
on Abit's MB in one of the kernels on the 7.0, but I didn't see the patch in
the kernel sources. (makes it a little tough to rebuild your kernel if your
only drive lives on the controller..) Is the patch on the 7.0 image
s
16 matches
Mail list logo