Re: New Aurora - is it a joke? Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-06-02 Thread Stew Benedict
OK, I'll speak up since I started this uproar by updating the package. All I did was add some patches to WsLib, so Aurora framebuffer would work on PPC, and add a "BuildRequires" for PPC in Aurora to insure the appropriate WsLib is used. I've noted the circular "Requires" mentioned before, and

New Aurora - is it a joke? Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-06-01 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > There was no updates to Aurora for a long time. Not that there are many > bugs, but still I'd like to see my Intellimouse finally working in > Aurora ... > then it is of bad taste. Updated Aurora - and again link /etc/aurora/Monitor broken. Something that was repor

RE: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-05-29 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
> > Digital Wokan wrote: > > > I got tired of Aurora trying to make status and errors look pretty. I > > finally "rpm -e"'d the Aurora packages, and I intend to continue doing > > so after every system install until they become an optional part of the > > install (kinda like starting X at boot i

Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-05-29 Thread Digital Wokan
Yes, and I can have IE stop being my default browser after I've installed Mozilla. That doesn't mean I don't wish I had the option not to install Internet Explorer in the first place. Joseph T Watson wrote: > Digital Wokan wrote: > > I got tired of Aurora trying to make status and errors look pr

Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-05-29 Thread Robert L Martin
Well, all I need to do is fire up Mandrake Control Center and under Boot - Boot Config, uncheck the "Launch Aurora at boot time" option, and it goes away!!! Seems kind of optional to me! point being in expert mode those kind of "pre

Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-05-29 Thread Joseph T Watson
Digital Wokan wrote: > I got tired of Aurora trying to make status and errors look pretty. I > finally "rpm -e"'d the Aurora packages, and I intend to continue doing > so after every system install until they become an optional part of the > install (kinda like starting X at boot is optional...

Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-05-27 Thread Digital Wokan
I got tired of Aurora trying to make status and errors look pretty. I finally "rpm -e"'d the Aurora packages, and I intend to continue doing so after every system install until they become an optional part of the install (kinda like starting X at boot is optional... hint, hint, Mdksoft). SI Reas

Re: [Cooker] Aurora development dead?

2001-05-27 Thread SI Reasoning
I could only get one "theme" to work within aurora... and if kudzu popped up, it sent a bunch of junk onto the screen and I had no way to get to it. --- Andrej Borsenkow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was no updates to Aurora for a long time. Not > that there are many > bugs, but still I'd l