Norman Carver wrote:
I have a number of machines with 1.5-2GB of ram on them, and have been
running the Enterprise (himem) kernels on them (starting with MDK 8.0).
We have had no problems that I would blame on the Enterprise kernels.
In fact, the only problems we have had were memory corruption
Peter Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84
I have a number of machines with 1.5-2GB of ram on them, and have been
running the Enterprise (himem) kernels on them (starting with MDK 8.0).
We have had no problems that I would blame on the Enterprise kernels.
In fact, the only problems we have had were memory corruption problems with
MDK 8.2,
spontaneous reboots - replaced with 400W).
Bill Shirley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:cooker-owner;linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of Norman Carver
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM
I have
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, andre wrote:
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other
How much
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Buchan Milne wrote:
No, he wants all machines (including my P133/32MB box which just runs a
firewall) to have the overhead of highmem, just so that weird issues ( I
Fine, so install both kernels at install if the installer sees more than
1024 MB RAM. It will be more and
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
Isnt highmem the only choice if i want to use 1024 MB RAM?
I think it would be great if MDK could do a highmem kernel also, not
just SMP + HIGHMEM kernel.
btw. do you really
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84 107520
-/+
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 21:35, Peter Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940
andre wrote:
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:59, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
some of the posts last month, several people had problems with the
highmem kernels.
btw. do you really need the highmem kernel for 1024 MB ram? I
Peter Magnusson wrote:
What exactly is the difference between the enterprise kernel and the
normal kernel? Only highmem?
High mem and SMP AFAIK. It does say what the differences are during the
installation process. Might be a little bit too late for your but FYI.
-Larry
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
There was an error when generating initrd try to do a :
/sbin/mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.4.18-6mdkenterprise.img 2.4.18-6mdkenterprise
and
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other
patchs in the case of memory2GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter Magnusson wrote:
|
|
|I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
|compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
|
|
|There was an error when generating initrd try to do a :
Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
I tried this:
[rootgauss root]# rpm -ivh kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.6mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:59, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
some of the posts last month, several people had problems with the
highmem kernels.
btw. do you really need the highmem kernel for 1024 MB ram? I thought
that the
16 matches
Mail list logo