Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread Reinhard Katzmann
Hi Jason, On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 02:10:05PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. In addition to making the distribution larger, I would think that distributing multiple compilers complicates

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread Stew Benedict
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. Are there packages in the Mandrake distribution which can not compile with gcc 3.0? Are there any packages in the Mandrake distribution which

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread David Walser
For what? It compiles fine with gcc 2.95.3, which I see there's a Cooker package for, and AFAIK, egcs doesn't do pentium optimization. --- Stew Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel22 still needs egcs __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread Stew Benedict
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, David Walser wrote: For what? It compiles fine with gcc 2.95.3, which I see there's a Cooker package for, and AFAIK, egcs doesn't do pentium optimization. true - but we don't ship an x86 version, 2.95 is there for PPC, as 2.96 has some issues on PPC Stew Benedict --

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-26 Thread Maks Orlovich
On Saturday 26 January 2002 02:10 pm, you wrote: I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. In addition to making the distribution larger, I would think that distributing multiple compilers complicates support issues. Are there packages