[COOT] python and coot question

2009-01-30 Thread William G. Scott
Hi citizens: OS X comes with a version of python that doesn't play well with x- windows-based modules, so when compiling and running coot, I would like to make sure that I use a different version of python that has things like the gtk2 modules in its sys.path. However, despite having the

Re: [COOT] python and coot question

2009-01-30 Thread Nathaniel Echols
This has been a problem on and off with recent OS X binary builds too. The interpreter is actually supposed to be coot itself - I don't think /sw/bin/python is going to do you any good, since it doesn't have access to the memory of the running coot process. I don't know what the source of the var

Re: [COOT] python and coot question

2009-01-30 Thread William G. Scott
On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Nathaniel Echols wrote: the binaries I was using of coot-0.5-pre1 had this problem, while coot-0.5.1-pre1-1661 used the correct interpreter. That sounds like something I made, in which case I am even more puzzled. The interpreter is actually supposed to be co

Re: [COOT] python and coot question

2009-01-30 Thread William Scott
I still think coot is somehow using /usr/bin/python, despite the fact that configure fails unless I specify -I/sw/include/python2.5, or at least it is using the OS X system's python filesystem to create its own sys.path If I explicitly export into PYTHONPATH everything that gets coded in