On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:42:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. When instant seconds and zone
> co-exist in parsed data, instant seconds was not resolved correctly from them.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by scolebourne (Author).
PR: https://git.open
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:42:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. When instant seconds and zone
> co-exist in parsed data, instant seconds was not resolved correctly from them.
Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:42:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. When instant seconds and zone
> co-exist in parsed data, instant seconds was not resolved correctly from them.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.ne
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:42:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. When instant seconds and zone
> co-exist in parsed data, instant seconds was not resolved correctly from them.
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:42:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. When instant seconds and zone
> co-exist in parsed data, instant seconds was not resolved correctly from them.
Marked as reviewed by joehw (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.n
Please review the fix to the subject issue. When instant seconds and zone
co-exist in parsed data, instant seconds was not resolved correctly from them.
-
Commit messages:
- 8272473: Parsing epoch seconds at a DST transition with a non-UTC parser is
wrong
Changes: https://git.open