On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
Thanks.
> I don't think AtomicLong was ever needed here.
>
It was crudely used as a holder of the count, since captured refs are
(effectively) final, and not for it's concurrent properties as i wanted to
avoid using any
Looks fine to me. I don't think AtomicLong was ever needed here.
-Chris.
On 10/01/14 10:01, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
A small tweak is required to a recent Stream-based test i added to stop some
internal lambda-based ser/derialization (SAND) tests barfing since the test is
hostile to ser/derial
Hi,
A small tweak is required to a recent Stream-based test i added to stop some
internal lambda-based ser/derialization (SAND) tests barfing since the test is
hostile to ser/derialization, and infact i should have probably written the
test like below in the first place.
Kumar has verified it
