On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:05:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> I really wish this change was not done with ClassFile API, but with a
>>> simple bundled ASM, so it would be easily backportable, if we decide to. It
>>> does not look like CFA buys us a lot here readability/complexity wise:
>>> [d9
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:01:47 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> > I really wish this change was not done with ClassFile API, but with a
> > simple bundled ASM, so it would be easily backportable, if we decide to. It
> > does not look like CFA buys us a lot here readability/complexity wise:
> > [d99b
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:57:42 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> This patch suggests a workaround to an issue with huge SCF MH expression
>> trees taking excessive JIT compilation resources by reviving (part of) the
>> simple bytecode-generating strategy that was originally available as an
>> all-or
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:33:26 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> What are the scenarios which had regressions?
>> Given the conservative growth for StringBuilder, it surprises me a bit that
>> any scenario would regress.
>
> I took a second look and it turns out that there were neither regressions no
> This patch suggests a workaround to an issue with huge SCF MH expression
> trees taking excessive JIT compilation resources by reviving (part of) the
> simple bytecode-generating strategy that was originally available as an
> all-or-nothing strategy choice.
>
> Instead of reintroducing a bin
