Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 04:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 10/01/2010 09:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
>>>
>>> I think I'm going to write a POSIX bug requesting that time_t be
>>
On 10/01/2010 04:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/01/2010 09:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
I think I'm going to write a POSIX bug requesting that time_t be
tightened to integral in light of the
On 10/01/2010 09:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
I think I'm going to write a POSIX bug requesting that time_t be
tightened to integral in light of the fact that subsecond support is now
uniforml
On 10/01/2010 09:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
time_t can be a float on weird platforms I think?
If you use nstrftime, no one can complain ;-)
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
My understanding of POSIX is that time_t was p
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 02:21 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
+static char * ATTRIBUTE_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT
+epoch_time (struct timespec t)
+{
+ static char str[INT_STRLEN_BOUND (time_t) + sizeof ".N"];
+ if (TYPE_SIGNED (time_t))
+sprintf (str, "%" PR
On 10/01/2010 02:21 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
+static char * ATTRIBUTE_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT
+epoch_time (struct timespec t)
+{
+ static char str[INT_STRLEN_BOUND (time_t) + sizeof ".N"];
+ if (TYPE_SIGNED (time_t))
+sprintf (str, "%" PRIdMAX ".%09lu", (intmax_t) t.tv_sec,
+
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 01/10/10 00:32, Eric Blake wrote:
>> * src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
>> (print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
>> * NEWS: Document this.
>> * tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
>> ---
>>
>> It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in 'stat --format',
On 01/10/10 00:32, Eric Blake wrote:
> * src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
> (print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
> * NEWS: Document this.
> * tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
> ---
>
> It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in 'stat --format',
> especially, since we don't
* src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
(print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
* NEWS: Document this.
* tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
---
It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in 'stat --format',
especially, since we don't support any format modifiers for getting
at the addit
