Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

2009-02-19 Thread M W487
I was going to send a message to the Net::SMTP author, when I noticed that there are two related reports. Is that any kind of clue? http://groups.google.com/group/perl.cpan.testers/search?group=perl.cpan.testers&q=mw487.yahoo.com+%22feb+14%22+mpp&qt_g=Search+this+group http://tinyurl.com/ctdowu

Re: Your W3C-LinkChecker test reports

2009-02-19 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thursday 19 February 2009, David Cantrell wrote: > > > Check out the tests for Data::Compare, and how that turns PERL5LIB into > > > a load of -Ifoo -Ibar -Ibaz for taint tests. > > > > Sure, but as I mentioned, AFAIU that would only "fix" the test suite, > > while the script (which has -T as we

Re: Your W3C-LinkChecker test reports

2009-02-19 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:37:26AM +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > Getting rid of the -T both in the script and the test case would be one > solution, but I'm not quite happy with that either, especially > because "checklink" is a CGI script in addition to a command line one. > > Thoughts? Did I

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

2009-02-19 Thread David Golden
For what it's worth -- this type of thing has been seen before and from both CPANPLUS and CPAN::Reporter based testers. It's as if two (or more) emails were smashed together into one. Our hypothesis is that there is something happening in the way Net::SMTP talks to certain mail servers. -- David