Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Build 3.8.2 to move to "archives"

2013-08-20 Thread David M Williams
updates == p2 repository That's not changing. Just the "zips". From: Eike Stepper To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 08/21/2013 02:31 AM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Build 3.8.2 to move to "archives" Sent by:cross-project-issues-d

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Build 3.8.2 to move to "archives"

2013-08-20 Thread Eike Stepper
Am 21.08.2013 05:04, schrieb David M Williams: Actually, it has been there on archives since March but, the purpose of this note is to give warning it will be removed from "downloads server". This will only impact you if you have any build or download scripts that point specifically to th

[cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler SR1 RC1

2013-08-20 Thread David M Williams
Looks achievable. Current there are 3 projects with disabled repositories or features: dltk.b3aggrcon gyrex.b3aggrcon riena.b3aggrcon I've opened bug 415535 to actually remove the feature in DLTK that is disabled, since it was disabled the whole development cycle, and its confusing to keep s

[cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Luna M1

2013-08-20 Thread David M Williams
Doesn't look good. I'll admit there is one day left, but so far 50 projects have not even enabled their "contribution" to Luna (pasted below). Thank you to the 20 of you who have. Remember, enable your contribution if you plan to participate (remove the "enabled="false"), but disable your re

[cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Build 3.8.2 to move to "archives"

2013-08-20 Thread David M Williams
Actually, it has been there on archives since March but, the purpose of this note is to give warning it will be removed from "downloads server". This will only impact you if you have any build or download scripts that point specifically to the "downloads" version. For now, I've left a m

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are about.ini, about.mappings and about.properties obsolete?

2013-08-20 Thread Ed Willink
Hi Thanks. On 20/08/2013 12:16, Paul Webster wrote: Version: {featureVersion}\n\ Build id: {0}\n\ ... We have Build id to be configured to be almost identical to featureVersion, so it is redundant. It seems about.mappings can be eliminated avoiding a no-change build change about.properties

[cross-project-issues-dev] EMF Facet in Luna will be late

2013-08-20 Thread Grégoire Dupé
Hello, I'm not able to deliver EMF Facet 0.4.0 in Luna on time, because EMF Facet uses org.eclipse.emf.validation which is not available yet. Regards, Grégoire ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.e

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are about.ini, about.mappings and about.properties obsolete?

2013-08-20 Thread Vincent Zurczak
Hi, Personally, I use it to insert the build ID in the about dialog of my RCP. However, by using Tycho and the Maven ANT plugin, one can easily an alternative mechanism if required. I have already tested it. So, I cannot decide whether it is st

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are about.ini, about.mappings and about.properties obsolete?

2013-08-20 Thread Paul Webster
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Ed Willink wrote: > > While checking why a rebuild refreshed a JAR file, I discovered that an > about.mappings file gets rewritten during a build to contain the build-id. > This was perhaps useful 5 years ago. Has it gone obsolete? Is it used > anywhere? > about.

[cross-project-issues-dev] Are about.ini, about.mappings and about.properties obsolete?

2013-08-20 Thread Ed Willink
Hi While checking why a rebuild refreshed a JAR file, I discovered that an about.mappings file gets rewritten during a build to contain the build-id. This was perhaps useful 5 years ago. Has it gone obsolete? Is it used anywhere? It certainly seems a shame to churn built JAR files for no ver